SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : Any info about Iomega (IOM)? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Robert Skinner who wrote (44985)1/23/1998 1:43:00 PM
From: Tom Gebing  Respond to of 58324
 
Nice move Mr. Skinner..... I see your skinning again......



To: Robert Skinner who wrote (44985)1/23/1998 1:44:00 PM
From: Spank  Respond to of 58324
 
Bob, glad to hear it!

I wish my truck wasn't out of gas! I'm gonna have to siphon
something from somewhere as it is...

but not my iom!

-Spank



To: Robert Skinner who wrote (44985)1/23/1998 1:45:00 PM
From: Teddy  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 58324
 
Oh, now i get it: Dow Jones Newswires -- January 23, 1998
Iomega Down As $100M Ad Gamble Throws Scare Into Investors

By Maria V. Georgianis

NEW YORK (Dow Jones)--Iomega Corp.'s (IOM) gamble to spend up
to $100 million more on advertising this year than last year has led analysts
to question whether the expense could hurt earnings.

That news is being cited for the recent plunge in Iomega's share price.
NYSE-listed Iomega's shares were recently off 4, or 31.4%, at 8 3/4. The
composite volume was 31.1 million shares, compared with average daily
volume of about 5 million.

The company told analysts of the dramatic increase in advertising spending,
which is at least three times as much as previous levels, during its
fourth-quarter conference call Thursday after the market close.

The ad campaign includes four spots during Sunday's Super Bowl and
increased print, radio and other television commercials.

Iomega's new ad strategy raises concern as to whether there's a slowdown
in the growth rate for the company's removable-storage products. The
company's unsold inventory has risen to six to eight weeks from the typical
four to six weeks, Iomega told analysts during the call.

The company's selling, general and administrative expenses will certainly
rise on account of the increased ad spending, and earnings could be hurt if
the advertising doesn't work.

Needham & Co. analyst Glenn Hanus said he cut his rating to hold from
buy and lowered his 1998 earnings estimate to 48 cents a share from 56
cents on account of the heightened advertising. The consensus estimate of
five analysts surveyed by First Call Corp. is for 1998 earnings of 62 cents a
share.

"They raised the bar on the risk factor because they're going to turn up the
volume of advertising," said Emerald Research analyst Joseph Besecker.
"They're making a fundamental change in midstream. Intuitively, it's certainly
confusing - that's why people are selling the stock."

Besecker said the plunge in the stock is more related to questions about the
company's advertising plans than to Iomega's below-consensus
fourth-quarter earnings.

The company reported earnings of 14 cents a basic share, compared with a
First Call consensus estimate of 15 cents.



To: Robert Skinner who wrote (44985)1/23/1998 1:48:00 PM
From: CASEY  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 58324
 
Was that a GARBAGE TRUCK because thats what you just picked up. Sold this pitiful stock on 12/30/97 @ 12.375. Just think if I held it until earnings came out. OUCH

Iomega is truly a widely hated stock and it would have to come up with some major shift in product offering down the road to ever get in favor with Wall Str.

Nobody likes a one product wonder no matter how many they sell.

Hope your stock is worth more next week. Don't count on it though. Once the truth is out RE Clinton this market is headed towards 6000 big time and a stock like IOM will have no support levels.



To: Robert Skinner who wrote (44985)1/23/1998 2:06:00 PM
From: Walt  Respond to of 58324
 
Bob: Good move. Filled up my truck too
Walt



To: Robert Skinner who wrote (44985)1/23/1998 2:39:00 PM
From: SunMaster  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 58324
 
Robert...at least someone on this thread is using their head and keeping cool.