Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Sdgla who wrote (1180610)

11/26/2019 6:23:43 PM

From: Wharf Rat

2 Recommendations

Recommended By
pocotrader
rdkflorida2

Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1577024

Clinton and Bush Navy Secretaries Warn Trump Is Damaging Our Military

Richard J. Danzig and Sean O’Keefe, who were Navy secretaries under Bill Clinton and George H.W. Bush, warned of President Trump, “His values are not those of our military. It will do grievous damage to our armed services if they become so.”

Writing in a bipartisan New York Times op-ed that there are three problems with Trump’s actions in interfering to “block a conduct review of a Navy SEAL” who was convicted of dishonoring the uniform after he posed with the dead body of an ISIS prisoner, the former Navy secretaries blasted Trump’s values as dangerous for our armed services.

Their points:

1. It is the Navy’s business. The Navy must not be commanded via political agendas.

“it is very much the Navy’s business — and every military’s business — to maintain, as the military so often recites and Mr. Spencer put it in his final letter to the president, “good order and discipline.” In conducting their “business,” our military services are not and must not be commanded in support of political ends, as Mr. Trump was apparently doing here.”

2. President Trump’s thoughts are shaped by TV commentators and tweeting his commands without hearing perspectives from those who have made the sacrifices of combat (shade shade shade for the bone spurs president) violates proper procedure.

“Contamination from the president’s approach is amplified when his judgment is largely shaped by television commentators and his decision announced by tweet…

… Wise presidents let those who have made the sacrifices of combat — and who depend upon one another in combat — state first what they conclude.”

3. Trump’s judgment itself will be taken as our values and will do “grievous damage” to our military. Troops will be misled by the president’s “sense, or lack of sense, of honor.”

“An American service member shared a photograph of himself with a corpse along with the message: ‘I have got a cool story for you when I get back. I have got my knife skills on.’ Our president’s endorsement of the perpetrator will be taken as a representation of our values. Our own troops, many of them teenagers, will be misled by the president’s sense, or lack of sense, of honor.”

Quoting from Mr. Spencer’s final letter, “The rule of law is what sets us apart from our adversaries,” they finished:

“Our president should aspire to the same view. His values are not those of our military. It will do grievous damage to our armed services if they become so.”

This scathing opinion piece comes just two days after fired Navy Secretary Richard Spencer (a Trump appointee) said of Trump’s actions, “What message does that send to the troops? That you can get away with things.”

The ousted Navy Secretary added, “I don’t think really understands the full definition of a warfighter.”

Bipartisan military leaders are warning that the president does not share their values.

It shouldn’t go unsaid that this exact undermining of our military is one of Russia’s stages of warfare against a country it’s attacking. It’s beyond odd for any president to behave like Trump is, but instead of seeing it as Trump’s love for another person’s psychological sickness and cruelty, it should also be seen in the larger context, especially given the allegations laid out in the Mueller report and now Trump’s own transcript of his phone call with the president of Ukraine: President Trump is not working for this country.

He might be working for himself, he might be compromised, we don’t have all of the answers yet. But we do know that Trump can’t win a U.S. election for president without cheating and that he is trying to cheat again by bribing a foreign country to help him. We know that he (and or his campaign) asked Russia for help in 2016 and took help from them. Mueller wrote that this coordination was established, but what he didn’t feel he could establish was that the Trump entourage knew it was illegal when they did it.

Most of us don’t get that kind of privilege, but at any rate, they do know now. And they are still doing it. This puts Trump’s interference in our military in a different light, one that would terrify Republicans if it were a Democrat.

Ironically, Trump is actually doing what Republicans hysterically – and wrongly – screamed that former President Obama was doing, that is, radically transforming America and working for/with a foreign government, having an “un-American” agenda.

To: Sdgla who wrote (1180610)	11/26/2019 7:11:35 PM
From: Thomas A Watson	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1577024

Keeping America the greatest in the Land of the free and home of brave and hell for leftyloon scum. The incandescent light of freedom shines on. Land of the free: in shock decision, US allows citizens to choose whatever light globe they want In a rare move for consumers, US citizens will not be forced to buy LED soul-and-body-clock destroying globes next year as was planned. Instead they can frivolously continue to buy incandescent globes if they so choose. Despite the Democrats best efforts to stop droughts and bushfires with indoor lighting, no US citizen will be denied the chance to save their own money and enjoy a more natural spectrum of lighting in the privacy of their own home. If you like your sleeping patterns, you can keep them… BBC (This was announced in September 2019) The US is scrapping a ban on energy-inefficient light bulbs which was due to come in at the beginning of 2020. The rule would have prohibited the sale of bulbs that do not reach a standard of efficiency, and could have seen an end to incandescent bulbs. Many countries have phased out older bulbs because they waste energy. But the US energy department said banning incandescent bulbs would be bad for consumers because of the higher cost of more efficient bulbs. The Department of Energy said it had withdrawn the ban because it was a misinterpretation of the 2007 Energy Independence and Security Act. Specifically, the law stipulated that restrictions on bulbs could only be implemented when it was economically justified, Shaylyn Hynes, a spokeswoman for the Department of Energy, told the New York Times.