SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: koan who wrote (1181018)11/28/2019 12:32:08 PM
From: Land Shark  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1576929
 
Yes, East Asia is at war with Eurasia




To: koan who wrote (1181018)11/28/2019 12:40:24 PM
From: Winfastorlose1 Recommendation

Recommended By
longnshort

  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 1576929
 
Trump went to Wharton at U of Penn. . So Trump is Ivy League at perhaps the best business school in the US. Spent his life doing huge construction projects. His high school was New York Military Academy. Became a private enterprise billionaire because he was so successful.

Obama? Came from a Kenyan Village. Was sponsored by Bill Ayers' family here in the US as a foreign student. Spent his high school years smoking dope (by self admission). Was a "community organizer" (protection racket operator) after school was over. Lived off the public for the entirety of his life.

I'll take Trump's experience over Mr Choom any day.



To: koan who wrote (1181018)11/30/2019 9:03:13 AM
From: locogringo3 Recommendations

Recommended By
D.Austin
FJB
Winfastorlose

  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1576929
 
Hillary Clinton Is not
just a sore loser,
she is a total loser


American Thinker, by Kenneth Eliasberg

Original Article

As one can readily see, Hillary Clinton has been unable to recover from having lost the 2016 presidential election -- a self-inflicted wound that she will never cop to. Or, possibly, an act of divine intervention. She has come up with well over a dozen reasons for her defeat -- every one but the real one, i.e. she is a loser -- not just a sore loser, but a total loser. She is incredibly incompetent, fundamentally dishonest, and criminally corrupt, and these are her good qualities. In addition, she is bereft of a trace of integrity or character, has absolutely no judgment, and is devoid of people skills



To: koan who wrote (1181018)12/23/2019 12:32:11 PM
From: Maple MAGA 2 Recommendations

Recommended By
FJB
Winfastorlose

  Respond to of 1576929
 
Socialism Really is a Cult

Our Dutch correspondent H. Numan takes a look at the bizarre wave of socialist madness that is currently raging on both sides of the Atlantic.



Socialism really is a cult

by H. Numan

A bit of a bold statement, I know. Let me explain. There is nothing wrong with being social. After all, we humans are social animals. However, socialism as a political ideology is wrong. Very wrong. Socialism doesn’t work. It lets others do the work. Socialism has failed wherever it was implemented. It sometimes took a while, but it always failed. The few states left over that really are socialist are failing or going to fail. No question about it. With one exception: China. But China is first Chinese, then Chinese, then a long time nothing and finally they are socialist. Sort of socialist, that is.

Now, China has always been an absolute monarchy. Not surprisingly Mao ruled as one too, and so does the present emperor — who is titled president for life now. Not emperor, but effectively the same thing. Just a different name. He isn’t socialist, he’s Chinese. Red was always the preferred color for the Chinese. Red being the color of socialism is just an extra. All Chinese companies are effectively, if not outright, state-run organizations.

China has two major problems that it cannot solve: first of all, their failed one child policy. By the time China becomes a real superpower their army will be made up of old fogies with crutches and drips. Don’t underestimate that problem. China already has huge problems finding sufficiently capable soldiers at this very moment. Imagine what it will be like in twenty years, when they really will have an enormous manpower problem.

The second problem is corruption. Corruption is ingrained in Chinese society, regardless of ideology. Socialism only makes it worse, much worse. The current Chinese leadership is more worried about the reliability of their army, specifically the top brass, than anything else right now. If worst comes to worst, we can always buy a couple of Chinese army commanders. The leadership knows it, and dreads it.

On the bright side: China is not interested in conquering the world. Just the business part of it. On the not-so-bright side: they’re damned good at it. China is a problem for the future. Right now we have bigger worries. The first is socialism, and the second one is mohammedanism. More about mohammedanism in another article.

So let’s get back on topic. Socialism is a cult. You see it in America, where the Democrat party is anything but democratic right now. And in England, where the Labour party should rename itself the Stalinist party. Likewise, in all western countries social democratic parties have been taken over by diehard old-fashioned communists. And … the left is again losing. Again, because they have learned nothing from the past. Like Louis XVIII of France, the king who replaced Napoleon: they have learned nothing and forgotten nothing.

Jeremy Corbyn even had the gumption to say: “We have won the debate, but failed to achieve a majority.” His followers blame everyone — except themselves. They blame the ‘extreme right-wing media’ for their loss. And of course the silly, stupid and antediluvian electorate. Anyone and anything, except themselves. Now, the media in Europe are about as left-wing as Pravda was during the heydays of communism. It was Corbyn (and his minions) who vilified themselves. Not the media.

For Corbyn really is a vile person. He is a warm supporter of every socialist dictator alive. Kim Jong-Un, Maduro and Castro among others are his friends. Corbyn is a virulent antisemite, though he calls himself anti-Zionist. It’s exactly the same, but being antisemitic is nowadays punishable by law. Hamas and Hezbollah are his friends; they fight against the capitalist Zionist conquerors of their country. The media did all they could to soften Corbyn’s words so it wouldn’t hurt him too much. Labour adherents who say the BBC is a right-wing broadcaster are delusional.

Likewise in America your ‘Democrats’ are making fools of themselves as well. The impeachment is nothing more than a last-ditch effort to stop the clearing of the swamp. A weak and sad attempt. It won’t succeed because it can’t succeed. Impeachment, yes. At the moment the ‘Democrats’ have a majority in Congress. But the verdict is decided in the Senate where the Republicans have a very comfortable majority. Even if a few renegade Republican senators were to commit political suicide by voting for impeachment, it’s not enough. If I as a non-American with little legal knowledge about the impeachment procedure can clearly see that, so can the ‘Democrat’ party. Notice that the only real offenses directly mentioned in the acts of impeachment for which Trump can be prosecuted, bribery and blackmail, are not in the indictment.

It’s nothing more than a vile attempt to vilify Trump and to divert attention. Again, everybody has done it — but not the Democrats. Even worse, this is the second impeachment attempt. With even less chance of success. So why do they do it?

Most of it is revenge. Both the Democrat and Labour parties thought they would win. But they unexpectedly didn’t. In the nick of time Donald Trump and Boris Johnson snatched their assured victory away. Worse, both won massively. Even with the full support of nearly all the media (less so in the USA) the socialists lost. In both countries the electorate has had enough of thinly disguised Marxists ranting doctrine. That hurts. They want revenge, or at least to take their hated opponents with them down the drain.

Now you may ask, how is it possible that die-hard Marxists could take over the Labour and Democrat parties? That’s very easy to do. You do a hostile takeover. Simply go to the party meeting with enough supporters and vote the board away. Easy as pie. I’ve seen it in action myself. Not that many people attend those yearly board meetings. All you need is enough supporters to vote your desired candidates into office. Let’s say a local party with 2,500 members. During the annual meeting about 100 people will show up. In order to take over that local party you need a simply a majority. So 51 supporters is enough. But there are always people who will vote with you and people who abstain, so if you show up with less than 40 supporters that’s likely enough to take over the local party. The other 2,460 members don’t matter.

That’s how die-hard communists took over both parties. Now there is a huge difference between the electorate and the party hierarchy. The electorate wants a social program. The party hierarchy wants to implement and enforce a Stalinist socialist program. Anyone not toeing the party line is eliminated. Not only inside the party, but even more outside their respective parties.

Look at Twitter: the corporation is rigidly enforcing progressive ideology. Anyone remotely crossing the line is banned. Look at Facebook. Exactly the same. Google fires employees who dare to say water is wet, for the progressive ideology of the moment said it isn’t. All left-wing parties everywhere vilify anyone who dares to oppose them as extreme right wing, fascists, neonazis or old fogies.

What the losing left-wingers do is look at their friends on Twitter and Facebook and pretend that is the majority. Those people say what they want to hear, therefore it must be the majority. That’s exactly what members of a cult do.

Across the board progressive ideology is losing. Massively. Again they have failed. Communism failed. We didn’t win the Cold War: they lost it. That’s something else. Despite the massive advantages we gave them, they still lost. The MiG 15 was such an excellent fighter because the British Labourgovernment gave them, free of charge, the best engine in the world at the time. The communist and social parties in the west did whatever possible to assist and support the USSR. On the other side of the Iron Curtain there weren’t any parties, apart from the local communist party. The communist administrations kept a very close eye on what everybody thought. And yet… they are gone.

The current crop of progressives are without much exception upper middle-class students, led by the last wave before them. I’ve seen photos of Hillary and Bill as hippies in their younger years. The progressives talk among themselves and think that it is the opinion of the working man. They read only what they see on Facebook and Twitter. As soon as questions are asked, they hide in their safe spaces. Being young, they have little knowledge how the world works. Everything is black and white. In their case: black and red. Any other color should be banished forever.

The left is losing out. In America the swamp will be drained in 2020 after the elections. In England the cleanup begins after Christmas. This is a massive blow to the EU. Add to that the demise of Angela Merkel. Politically she’s already dead and buried. In France Le Pen is going very strong. You don’t hear a lot about that — for that reason. In Italy the EU was able to manipulate the left-wing parties into a pro EU government. All last-ditch efforts to postpone the inevitable.

In dear little Holland we have now a minority cabinet. One member of the Conservatives (VDD) went independent. The majority had exactly one seat. Not anymore. We just lost a junior minister in a tax scandal, and are about to loose the woma… minister of Defense. Not for tax reasons, but because of a bombing raid by the Dutch air force (lots of air, not so much force) in Syria. Mark Rutte is leading his last cabinet. And going down by the day in the polls. From 33 seats to 19 right now.

That doesn’t mean to say Geert Wilders will become prime minister. The cabinet is still surviving, but I expect a resignation at some point next year. Over what, I have no idea. That’s in the future. In Holland the progressives feel safe enough. But time is running out. For them as well.

— H. Numan



To: koan who wrote (1181018)12/28/2019 2:51:41 PM
From: FJB2 Recommendations

Recommended By
longnshort
Winfastorlose

  Respond to of 1576929
 
My Socialist Hell

An Invitation to Hollywood Chavistas: Come to Caracas and Switch with Me




breitbart.com

My Invitation to Hollywood Chavistas: Come to Caracas

Christian K. Caruzo



CARACAS, Venezuela – The late 2000s were a hip time for smug leftists around the world, who were quick to praise the new sweetheart on the socialist housing block: Venezuela.

The oil bonanza made Venezuela richer beyond its wildest dreams, creating the false impression that socialism had at last found success after so many failed attempts. Now that socialism in this country has reached its inevitable crash-and-burn phase, Venezuela suddenly (and conveniently) isn’t “real socialism” anymore.

Politicians and a few Hollywood celebrities stood among those who sang Hugo Chavez’s praise during that time, conducting regular pilgrimages to the “socialist utopia.” Sean Penn, Oliver Stone, and Danny Glover, just to name a few Hollywood individuals — they all came to praise and celebrate that at last, after endless failed attempts, socialism had finally “succeeded” in Venezuela. Michael Moore partied all night with big man Hugo himself, while Naomi Campbell did her part in giving Chavez a softball interview.



Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez(R) and actor/activist Danny Glover hug while attending the CITGO-Venezuela Heating Oil Program inauguration ceremony at the Mt. Olivet Baptist Church in Harlem 21 September. (TIMOTHY A. CLARY/AFP via Getty Images)

I remember these visits being widely broadcast on the state’s TV channels here and weaponized as some sort of “take that, America!” jab. In the case of Michael Moore, his documentaries have been often used as ingredients for several of the regime’s anti-US narratives on our state TV network. Chavez, a man who had by then rewritten the constitution, closed independent TV channels, and eliminated term limits to remain in power, was praised as a forward-thinking progressive in one of Oliver Stone’s documentary premieres.



Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez (R) jokes with British top model Naomi Campbell during a visit to a populated neighbourhood in Caracas 31 October 2007. (JUAN BARRETO/AFP via Getty Images)

Remember, when socialism inevitably fails then it’s not “Real Socialism” anymore because their specific, one hundred percent pure and distilled brand of Socialism has never ever been tried.

If these smug western leftists really want to live the Venezuelan socialist experience or have their family members live in this utopian dream then they’re more than welcome to swap houses with me — I’ll do it in a heartbeat. Sure, I don’t have a luxurious mansion like these celebrities and politicians do, but this apartment is cozy enough. Some days the government even allows us to have running water!.

Still, I’d more than happily trade this socialist paradise for an evil capitalist-built mansion in the Hollywood Hills. It’d be hard saying goodbye to the glorious breadlines of equality, and I’m sure I’ll miss the regular power blackouts too, but I’m sure I’ll survive somehow.

Or perhaps I could crash in one of Bernie Sanders’ three houses?

Lefties around the world sure love to denounce the “evil US Imperialism that wants its hands on Venezuela,” blissfully providing oxygen to the regime’s propaganda narratives with campaigns such as #HandsOffVenezuela. In one of the most ironic cases, one of the groups that loves to cry wolf and proclaim that America simply wants to invade Venezuela recently invaded one of our embassies.



American leftists hijack the Venezuelan embassy in Washington, DC, attracting Venezuelan citizens who demanded they leave. (SAUL LOEB/AFP via Getty Images)

What’s really bewildering to me is the fact that some of these organizations and people are so deep into their hatred of “American Imperialism” that they would rather defend a murderous narco-regime, going as far as to ignore the fact that China has trapped my country with their very own palpable imperialism just to go against the United States. They’re certainly more than welcome to express their opinion freely (something I can’t do in this country unless I want a twenty-year prison sentence) and like or dislike whichever country they want. But please, don’t let your dislike of neoconservative foreign policy lead you to defend this catastrophe of a regime in Venezuela.

The left is trigger-happy when denouncing anything and everything as “racist”, yet, when a Venezuelan happens to speak their opinion in English on social media they will rapidly call you “not a real Venezuelan” because how could a real Venezuelan ever say anything bad about the socialist utopia? I’ve been told that having an acceptable grasp of English makes my claim to be a Venezuelan suspect. The color of your skin is also questioned – as if our skin tones make the bread lines shorter or longer, or has any effect on our water rations and medical shortages.



Oliver Stone and Hugo Chavez attend “South Of The Border” premiere at the Sala Grande during the 66th Venice Film Festival on September 7, 2009 in Venice, Italy. (Getty Images)

Readers of Breitbart probably know this already, but for the American left you’re only allowed to be a minority if you’re convenient to their political narrative.

This is something that not only I have experienced, but that of my fellow Venezuelan friends and strangers too. “Leftists are the real racists” has become a cliché slogan in some quarters, but I’m regularly reminded of its truth.

But anyway, Bernie – how about one of those mansions?

Christian K. Caruzo is a Venezuelan writer and documents life under socialism. You can follow him on Twitter here.



To: koan who wrote (1181018)12/28/2019 3:40:10 PM
From: FJB3 Recommendations

Recommended By
Bill
locogringo
Winfastorlose

  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1576929
 
MR. MADDOW CLAIMS HE IS ALL FAKE NEWS, NOTHING HE SAYS IS TRUE. HE IS SO STUPID, HE DOESN'T KNOW WHAT 'LITERALLY' EVEN MEANS.

zerohedge.com

Maddow Meltdown: In Defense To OAN Lawsuit, Host Argues His Words Are Not Facts

Back in September, we reported that TV network OAN had filed a lawsuit against Rachel Maddow for the time the host said that OAN “really, literally is paid Russian propaganda.”

Now, Maddow finds herself having to come up with a defense for her statement in court. And she has also apparently hired Lionel Hutz as her legal adviser.

According to Culttture, her lawyers argued in a recent motion that "…the liberal host was clearly offering up her ‘own unique expression’ of her views to capture what she saw as the ‘ridiculous’ nature of the undisputed facts. Her comment, therefore, is a quintessential statement ‘of rhetorical hyperbole, incapable of being proved true or false."

Oh, it's capable of being proved false, alright. Maddow had previously claimed, on air, about one of OAN's reporters:

“In this case, the most obsequiously pro-Trump right wing news outlet in America is really literally is paid Russian propaganda,” and added, “Their on-air politics reporter (Kristian Rouz) is paid by the Russian government to produce propaganda for that government.”

The testimony of UC Santa Barbara linguistics professor Stefan Thomas Gries, however, stands at odds with Maddow's defense. Gries said: “It is very unlikely that an average or reasonable/ordinary viewer would consider the sentence in question to be a statement of opinion.”



Gries continued: “I am the second most widely-cited cognitive linguist and sixth most widely-cited living corpus linguist. The field of cognitive linguistics draws from both linguistics and psychology and studies how language interacts with cognition.”

OAN had filed the defamation suit in federal court in San Diego, according to AP. OAN is a small, family owned conservative network that is based in San Diego and has received favorable Tweets from the President. It is seen as a competitor to Fox News.

OAN's lawsuit claims that Maddow's comments were retaliation after OAN President Charles Herring accused Comcast of censorship. The suit said that Comcast refuses to carry its channel because “counters the liberal politics of Comcast’s own news channel, MSNBC.”

It was about a week after Herring e-mailed a Comcast executive when Maddow opened her show by referring to a Daily Beast report that claimed an OAN employee also worked for Sputnik News, which has ties to the Russian government.

Maddow said: “In this case, the most obsequiously pro-Trump right-wing news outlet in America really literally is paid Russian propaganda. Their on-air U.S. politics reporter is paid by the Russian government to produce propaganda for that government.”

Except Maddow, likely still upset from spending 3 years trying to promulgate a Russian hoax that didn't exist, didn't quite get her facts straight. Big surprise.



To: koan who wrote (1181018)12/28/2019 4:45:21 PM
From: FJB1 Recommendation

Recommended By
locogringo

  Respond to of 1576929
 
Hillary should give it another try, but this time don’t forget Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, Michigan, North Carolina & others!



To: koan who wrote (1181018)12/28/2019 4:50:03 PM
From: FJB  Respond to of 1576929
 
Why the long faces @msnbc? You got it right this time: Good news for America/Americans = bad news for democrats
These people are so pathetic all they care about is how it's going to affect their political power!



To: koan who wrote (1181018)2/10/2020 2:31:42 AM
From: Maple MAGA 3 Recommendations

Recommended By
bruwin
FJB
Thomas A Watson

  Respond to of 1576929