Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Biotech / Medical : NNVC - NanoViricides, Inc. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: HardToFind who wrote (12483)	12/3/2019 11:44:03 PM
From: BoredMember	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 12873

I'm not afraid to state my opinion and I don't think I've danced around my point. I think I've made it perfectly clear that I believe this was a scheme that was hatched with the intention of making money for management full stop. I've also said that Nanoviricides has succeeded better than Dr. Anil Diwan and Dr. Eugene Seymour ever expected. And that the company has delivered on everything they wanted and more. Their plan is and has worked flawlessly. And I've said that what the common share holder defines as success and delivering to plan is very different that what Dr. Anil Diwan and Dr. Eugene Seymour define as success and delivering on their plan. I think your confusion is the matter of perspective. I do not believe the science ever worked (and if you ask any credible medical doctor they will tell you the same thing). They have never published any papers showing their results, they have never fulfilled any of their stated commitments, timelines or objectives. The relationship with Theracour is a glaring conflict of interest and designed for one single purpose: to siphon money from Nanoviricides to Dr. Anil Diwan. Remember, like the $455K profit he will make from "loaning" money to Nanoviriced, every dollar that Nanoviriced spends puts .30 in Dr. Anil Diwan's pocket (plus his salary, personal expenses and stock grants provided by Nanoviricdes). His wife is the CFO and he has packed or neutered the board so they are completely ineffective. Dr.Eugene Seymour was a useful idiot for Dr. Anil Diwan, but in my opinion knew full well that this was not a legit operation from the onset. If, as some claim, he didn't know, and only found out later, then he is likely dumber than he already appears to be (which is actually quite possible). Once Anil didn't need him, he was cut loose. They have not completed toxicology testing on a single treatment in over 15 years. And they won't...ever. Why do you think that is? I also believe they have not made kilogram scam batches of the treatment that is replica table and/or will pass the definition of scaling production. They claim to have made kg batches of a Nanoviricide, but not replicated it. That is what is required for passing the FDA. I believe they have paid shills to post here and elsewhere, they use "paid media" to run stories on them, and they present at events that require them to pay to present. They've even won a bogus award that they received simply by paying for it. If you know ANYTHING about new drug development, even one that is "changing the paradigm" and "will be bigger than penicillin" you would know this isn't credible. If you followed this for a few years and noted the complete lack of delivery on every single commitment the company has made, you would know this is shady. My question is why ANYONE would think this wasn't a scam from inception? Can you name a single stated objective that the company has met over the past 15 years? And all those who claim Dr. Anil Diwan started out with good intentions, but then realized the drugs didn't work and was too far in to bail out, what hogwash. Even if that was true, doesn't becoming a thief or starting out as a thief still make you a thief? You yourself use the word "swindled" when referencing "...Dr. Anil Diwan SWINDLING the shareholders out of their $100M..." but refer to it as tough luck. Really? He was just lucky enough to swindle people? that doesn't make sense. Swindling is an active event, not "by chance."