Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Osicom(FIBR) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: John D. Morrison who wrote (4631)	1/23/1998 4:47:00 PM
From: craig crawford	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 10479

<< Have you ever considered this, Craig? Perhaps there are those of us on this thread who are aware that FIBR has had problems? >> Lousy management never just suddenly get it right. They have done nothing worthwhile in the past and will continue with their shenanigans in the future. I don't think management is inept, I think they need to stick to a simpler business like making license plates. Let's talk about these Net+Arm chips or whatever they are called. They sell for a measly $30 or $40 in quantity. FIBR is going to need to sell millions of these to drive any sales and earnings. Show me a market that is ready to accept millions of these things. FIBR isn't an INTC, TXN, or MOT.

To: John D. Morrison who wrote (4631)	1/23/1998 4:55:00 PM
From: Mama Bear	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 10479

I thought you were going to stop bickering with craig. I doubt craig is here to save you. I don't see why you don't counter his arguments. Sure, a lot of us have been here a long time and been through it so many times we're sick of it, but there are a lot of new eyes on this board now. I gotta tell you that if I didn't already know this company and had followed craig to this board because of what he said your attitude would definately start me thinking of shorting. You guys have actually got me wondering if he isn't right. Not him, too many holes. Just you. Oh well, it's too late to short it anyway. >>>There were many years there where IBM didn't look so hot on paper either.<<< Yep, and T didn't look very good earlier this year when you could have bought it at 31, or AMES when you could have had it at 3. But the revenues were there, and from revenues profits follow. It's why I like low PSR stocks, even if the balance sheet doesn't look too great. Barb