To: Hunter Vann who wrote (2367 ) 1/24/1998 9:46:00 AM From: alchemy Respond to of 4736
Hunter, I a responding to your post to clarify the source of the e-mail that you used. It was one of two e-mails that I sent to bob johnson. That was a naive mistake. My apologies to Tom and Elizabeth. I did not ask bob to keep them to himself. If the only weakness that you can find in NAMX is who is doing their accounting then we must be in damn good shape. Thank you Hunter. Fortunately, NAMX investors are a patient lot. We have time on our side. Let me repeat that almost every long term goal set by Paul Ebeling has been realized with the exception of the UPR deal. In fact, the most important goal of all, getting cash flow was met six months sooner than anticipated. And, it is wagonloads of cash. That must really burn your wick, Hunter, because it is clear proof of Paul's amazing performance. Paul is implementing D-T's plan in a business-like way. The NAMX Energy release is proof of that. As a NAMX investor, this pleases me because it is additional proof that Paul "says what he does and does what he says". As I have said before, we will have our answers in black and white in the company's earnings report. How many penny stocks do you know that are 12g reporting companies? Your job is to shake the longs out of their positions, but your frenzy only results in strengthening the determination of the longs to hang on primarily because of the desperation of your attacks. BTW, if you release that e-mail in which Cindy Crawford begs me to be her love slave for the rest of her life, I will get weallly, weally, angwy with you. From your first frantic post, the Hunter Vann Behaving Badly Show has been a must miss. It is lacking in creativity; it is tedious; it should be cancelled. Unfortunately, SI obviously has descended to the level of the AOL boards in '96 and leaves us no choice but to zap you any chance we get. Or move on. With all due respect, marty