Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : View from the Center and Left -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: JohnM who wrote (425529)	12/14/2019 11:53:18 AM
From: Jamie153	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 542139

SCOTUS first. By now you know SCOTUS won't hear any of the cases against Trump until June of next year. What does this mean in the real world? It means a president can break the law, not anwer subpoenas and the court will wait seven months to hear the case. Seven months in which a criminal can commit crimes against the country. Is there any legal justification for saying a legal subpoena is not legal? This case shouldn't even go to SCOTUS but if it does it should be decided within seconds since there is no legal justification for Trump's arguments. You say Dems are just as bad as republicans, but Dems have never stopped a president from appointing any judges which is what Moscow Mitch did until Reid used the nuclear option - the nuclear option being majority rule. Then the gop refused to hold one hearing on Obama's appointment to the court. There was no advice, no consent. There was only an abuse of power.