Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : The Trump Presidency -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Dracin72 who wrote (147495)	12/14/2019 7:17:47 PM
From: Wharf Rat	2 Recommendations Recommended By Dracin72 Ms. Baby Boomer Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 357255

I dunno. I'm disappointed. Maybe Justin Amash will try to add an amendment. Right now, both articles just say something to the effect that this is part of a larger pattern of behavior.

To: Dracin72 who wrote (147495)	12/14/2019 8:20:29 PM
From: combjelly	Respond to of 357255

My guess would be that they wanted stuff that is clear and unambiguous. Based on the way the House Republicans have reacted, they just gave up trying to claim Trump didn't do what he clearly did and started arguing process and just about anything else. The obstruction of justice events that Mueller outlined would be more complex. Things like his continual emoluments clause violations need to have certain things hashed out in court before they go much further. Many of his other actions fall under this heading also.