SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : View from the Center and Left -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: JohnM who wrote (425649)12/15/2019 2:33:09 PM
From: M. Murray  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 542970
 
Can't there be good precedents, and bad precedents, the latter we should stay away from?

There are judges right now that trump appointed that are presiding over cases, and making rulings in a court of law, and yet they have never argued a case before a judge. They were labeled "unqualified" by the American Bar Association. That is a terrible grade. This is the ABA saying this person should not be a judge.

Impeaching a judge with qualifications, or rather lack of qualifications like that should be a good precedent in my opinion.



To: JohnM who wrote (425649)12/15/2019 4:22:03 PM
From: Jamie153  Respond to of 542970
 
What is an impeachable offense for a judge? Failure to hold the criminal in the White House accountable for his crimes seems to be a gross violation of their duty. They're taking three of impeachment cases seven months after impeachment is over so any ruling they'll do will be meaningless.

The Roberts Court is acting like co-conspirators, not judges. No other court in US history was so blatantly hostile to the rule of law.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News