Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Presstek -- Stock of the Decade?? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Nanny who wrote (7963)	1/23/1998 9:59:00 PM
From: SG	Respond to of 11098

Nanny, Thank you...and I am pleased to know that those fingers are up and around again. I too have had a gut feeling about Q4, I hope its not Raliegh Baughman's (FTEL thread) chilie recipe backing up.<ggg> It would not be the first time that great numbers were posted by a Co. after "warnings" (if you call em warnings). Lurking is a drag, I like this a lot better. I have been keeping all of my e-mail as it may be valuable some day. The PRST crew reads this thread and they may be keeping a few samples of their own. Healthy discourse is very different than intentional misrepresentation. I will get off the soap box now before I break a leg. Thanks again, SG

To: Nanny who wrote (7963)	1/26/1998 10:14:00 AM
From: Pierre Panet-Raymond	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 11098

Nanny its not the 4th Q that investors are concerned about. "Don't be surprised if the 4th quarter earnings are a record!" Q4 is the last under the old Heidelberg regime. Its Q1 and beyond that the market is concerned about. It will be interesting though to see how the auditors treat some of the Q4 revenues given the statement made by the company on January 20th. "This may result in the Company's future revenues from its Quickmaster imaging kit being subject to unpredictable quarterly fluctuations." Until the auditors have signed off on the numbers, who knows what they are going to look like?