SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : Any info about Iomega (IOM)? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Zakrosian who wrote (45190)1/23/1998 11:04:00 PM
From: Brendan2012  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 58324
 
It sounds to me like IOM sold 7.6% fewer retail Zips than December 96. hmmmmmmm

OEM sales are way up at least, sequentially and year to year.

Brendan



To: Zakrosian who wrote (45190)1/23/1998 11:09:00 PM
From: jwk  Respond to of 58324
 
>> Are actual sales declining or is the rate of increase declining? <<

Ke clearly stated in a response to a direct question that it was the rate of increase which had slowed, but that sales were definately still growing. Actual sales are over 1mm per month and increasing.



To: Zakrosian who wrote (45190)1/23/1998 11:20:00 PM
From: the Druid  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 58324
 
I think the pace in that article is
defined as the difference in the growth rate.
IOM must have sold more last December than
December 1996. I think it is

Sales Dec. 97 sales Dec. 96
-------------- - --------------- = -7.6%
sales Dec. 96 sales Dec. 95

Do you think that this is a correct intepretation
of that article?


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News