Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Wharf Rat who wrote (1188840)	12/29/2019 5:17:32 AM
From: Maple MAGA	4 Recommendations Recommended By FJB IC720 Thomas A Watson Winfastorlose Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1570296

Yes we know Wharf Rat, Globalist Climate Change will need a one-world-socialist-order to distribute cash provided by US tax payers. More reparations will need to be paid to indigenous people led by Elizabeth Warren anytime someone, anywhere on the planet gets a sunburn.

To: Wharf Rat who wrote (1188840)	12/29/2019 12:08:41 PM
From: Thomas A Watson	2 Recommendations Recommended By FJB Winfastorlose Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1570296

dumbass ratie, the problem with Naomi Oreskes is that here early work explained very convincingly that all the Climate models are bullshit at prediction. Models cannot be verified and cannot be validated. ratie you being an cowardly anonymous lying asshole would swallow guardian diarrhea as gospel. you must avoid all science on the internet. Oreskes Vs. Oreskes Guest Blogger / 22 hours ago December 28, 2019 By Rud Istvan, edited by Charles Rotter WUWT reader Max alerted us to a 1994 Naomi Oreskes et. al. paper published in the prestigious journal Science. Her paper was a critical analysis of Earth Science numerical models. I asked Rud to take a look, since he had previously written on climate models both here and in the ebook Blowing Smoke. What follows is an edited version of what Rud sent us, approved for publication by him. After a quick read of Oreskes’s paper, I felt a double whammy was in order: 1. Explain Oreskes ‘science’ per se. 2. And then explain her later duplicitous conversion to rabid climate alarmist. This is evidenced by her books ‘Merchants of Doubt’ and ‘Why Trust Scientists’. This post is also another opportunity to restate, yet again, (using Oreskes own early explanations) some of the key problems with IPCC climate models, specifically CMIP5 for AR5. ...... wattsupwiththat.com