Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ms. Baby Boomer who wrote (1188994)	12/29/2019 5:32:04 PM
From: Jamie153	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1578423

Since Mueller had no intention of doing anything, his investigation was meritless. Mueller could have cleared this up by answering questions under oath but his refusal to do and also created a roadmap for Trump to follow and simply refuse to answer any subpoenas (as Mueller tried to do). Trump is following what Mueller did. IMO, history will not be kind to Mueller. No court in the land would make this decision. It's not based on law. It's based solely on an opinion within the FBI. The article says an indictment would be "unfair" since there are no legal ways to clear himself (Clinton's email did the same but they still went after her). After Clinton was cleared, Comey went before Congress and said she was guilty. It's amazing how they can twist the rules to suit their corrupt concepts of law.