SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: FJB who wrote (1189846)1/2/2020 9:11:24 AM
From: d[-_-]b  Respond to of 1576929
 
Is he auditioning for a role in an Airplane remake?




To: FJB who wrote (1189846)1/2/2020 9:31:17 AM
From: bruwin2 Recommendations

Recommended By
locogringo
Mick Mørmøny

  Respond to of 1576929
 
What a USELESS (and CROOKED) TWERP !!! --->




To: FJB who wrote (1189846)1/2/2020 10:18:37 AM
From: sylvester801 Recommendation

Recommended By
pocotrader

  Respond to of 1576929
 
BOMBSHELL: THE TRUMP COVER-UP UNFOLDING BEFORE OUR EYES

Last week, we got a small but tantalizing glimpse of the explosive cache of documents that the White House has tried to keep hidden from public view. They detailed the Trump administration's withholding of foreign aid to compel Ukraine to investigate one of the President's political rivals. It was a stark reminder that the administration is keeping vital information away from Congress and the public by stifling key witnesses who have firsthand knowledge of President Donald Trump's dealings with Ukraine.

Indeed, this is a cover-up, unfolding right before us.

The New York Times reported this week that, in late August, Trump met in the Oval Office with Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, then-national security adviser John Bolton and Secretary of Defense Mark Esper. The purpose of the meeting, according to the Times: to convince Trump that releasing the held-back foreign aid to Ukraine was "in the best national interests of the United States." Pompeo, Bolton and Esper reportedly "tried but failed" in their mission.
Here are a few things about this August meeting that cannot be reasonably contested, regardless of political ideology. The meeting was important to the overall Ukraine timeline. At that meeting, Trump discussed with his key advisers whether to release the foreign aid to Ukraine. The team of advisers urged Trump to do so, but he refused.

Whatever was said at that meeting is crucial evidence of Trump's plan and intent regarding Ukraine, for better or for worse. Pompeo, Bolton and Esper all know what happened during that meeting. And all of them have, in one form or another, honored Trump's blanket instruction to executive branch officials not to testify.

It is precisely because of the crucial missing evidence that we need a real trial in the Senate. If Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell succeeds in his plan to conduct a hasty impeachment trial devoid of actual evidence or substance -- and, remember, McConnell has admitted that he is acting in " total coordination" with the White House -- then, make no mistake, justice will not and cannot be served.
Maybe the suppressed documents and testimony truly exonerate Trump, or -- perhaps more plausibly -- cast doubt on the central allegations of abuse of power contained in the articles of impeachment. But unless Trump agrees to release the missing information, we will never know. Common sense, and my own prosecutorial experience, tell us that Trump is likely hiding evidence for the most common reason that anyone hides evidence in any case: because he knows it is devastating to his cause.

Now your questions
Karl (Arkansas): If McConnell refuses to allow witnesses to testify at the impeachment trial, do Democrats have any legal recourse?
If McConnell and Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer cannot reach a negotiated agreement, then Senate Democrats have limited options to compel witness testimony against the will of the Republican majority.
Senate Democrats could file a lawsuit challenging a determination by McConnell not to call any witnesses. But such a lawsuit almost certainly would fail. Courts are reluctant to intervene in what they call " political questions," and a Senate impeachment trial is a classic example. It is very unlikely that a court can or would dictate terms of an impeachment trial, given that the Constitution grants the Senate the "sole power to try all impeachments."
Senate Democrats also could request subpoenas from Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts, who will preside over the impeachment trial. But even if the chief justice granted a request for witnesses, he could be overridden by (or would defer to) a majority vote of the Senate, as even Schumer has acknowledged.

Given that Republicans hold a 53-47 Senate majority, Democrats would need to flip four Republican senators to vote with them to call witnesses or introduce other evidence. No Republican senator has committed to vote with the Democrats on those issues, though Alaska Sen. Lisa Murkowski has said she is "disturbed" by McConnell's open coordination with the White House on the impeachment trial -- perhaps signaling some willingness to join Democrats in favor of more fulsome trial procedures.
cnn.com



To: FJB who wrote (1189846)1/2/2020 10:23:58 AM
From: sylvester80  Respond to of 1576929
 
2020 PREDICTIONS: TRUMP WILL LOSE, IF NOT IN THE SENATE, THEN WITH THE VOTERS
thehill.com
BY JOHN LEBOUTILLIER, OPINION CONTRIBUTOR — 01/01/20 02:30 PM EST 2,813
THE VIEWS EXPRESSED BY CONTRIBUTORS ARE THEIR OWN AND NOT THE VIEW OF THE HILL

15,468 shares

The new year will have two main storylines: the impeachment trial and the November election. Looking at these chronologically, here are some predictions on how both could turn out:

The Senate impeachment trial — which two weeks ago seemed to be a slam-dunk whitewash for Donald Trump, engineered by Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) — now is the year’s biggest wild card. No one knows where this thing is headed.Do you recall in the Indiana Jones movie “ Raiders of the Lost Ark” when the Nazis opened the Ark of the Covenant on a remote Mediterranean Island? At first, all they found in it seemed to be some harmless, ancient sand. But then odd things began happening: Electrical machines stopped working; spirits appeared and turned from “beautiful” to deadly. Soon, every bad guy was dead and only Indiana Jones and his partner survived.This impeachment trial will be similar: All sorts of political spirits will be unleashed. Already, three GOP senators are (slightly) breaking away — Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska) and Susan Collins (R-Maine) are questioning the McConnell-led process, and now James Lankford (R-Okla.) has dared to criticize Trump’s character. Neither of these events would have happened before the House impeached Trump.The daily tracking polls are moving — albeit slightly — against Trump. In the MSN daily tracking poll, those who favor the president’s removal from office have grown since the Dec. 18 impeachment, to 55 percent; those opposed have fallen, to 40 percent.If there are compelling witnesses at the Senate trial, the polls might move toward 60 percent for removal. Then, all bets are off.The New York Times was given a tip that, in August, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, acting White House chief of staff Mick Mulvaney and then-national security adviser John Bolton met privately with Trump, urging him to release military aid to Ukraine; he reportedly refused. This was deliberately leaked to the Times for a reason, from someone on the inside.There will be more damaging leaks from inside the administration as the trial approaches. This reflects that almost everyone inside the administration knew the Ukraine scheme was disastrous, legally and politically, but Trump forced them to do it and then to cover it up.

Ever since the publication of the whistleblower’s complaint, Trump and his immediate staff have scrambled to keep a lid on things. But the looming trial is the lifting of the lid from the administration’s “ark.” The spirits are emerging — and we have no way of knowing where they are going or who they will consume.Yes, there will be at least 51 votes for witnesses in the Senate trial. Bolton, Mulvaney, presidential assistant Robert Blair and Office of Management and Budget official Michael Duffey will be called to testify.Trump will go ballistic. He knows their truthful testimony will expose him; he will do everything in his power to stop them from testifying.Several endangered and retiring GOP senators will question why Trump is trying to stop the four from testifying. GOP unity in the Senate will not hold, and nasty recriminations will appear before January is over.Trump will try to have the whistleblower called as a witness — not that it will happen — because he is terrified of other whistleblowers coming forward. He is trying to intimidate them into remaining silent. This will fail.

There will be another blockbuster whistleblower — on an entirely different scandal — whose information will be made public just as the Senate trial is underway. This will rock the political world.While the odds remain overwhelming that Trump is not removed in the Senate, there now is a 10 percent chance that he will be — and that percentage will grow as new revelations emerge. Remember, public opinion is the key here; if the “remove” numbers continue to grow, then anything is possible.The least that happens politically is that this impeachment process further damages Trump and makes his reelection less likely.Meanwhile, former Vice President Joe Biden will have a very good February; Democratic voters — after sampling Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) and South Bend, Ind., Mayor Pete Buttigieg — will return to Biden because of the one thing they care most about: defeating Trump in November. Biden is consistently ahead in the polls versus Trump — and Trump is spooked by Biden, which is why he orchestrated his Ukraine squeeze play and got impeached for it.Biden is the perfect anti-Trump candidate: decent, experienced, honest, kind. His contrast to Trump is clear as day. He will indeed be the Democrats’ nominee.The very first phone call Biden makes to ask someone to be his running mate will be to Michelle Obama. He knows a Biden-Obama ticket would be unbeatable — but, alas, Mrs. Obama has no interest in holding elective office.She and her husband will, however, campaign tirelessly for the eventual Joe Biden-Kamala Harris ticket; they will go to cities and suburbs and significantly increase Democratic turnout. The general election will see the highest voter turnout — in excess of 60 percent — since the last time we had such a bitterly divided nation, in 1968.Trump will lose massively in the popular vote and narrowly in the Electoral College.Why? Because, for three years, he’s made absolutely no effort to reach out to other voters; instead, he’s insulted anyone who dared to disagree with him.He either forgot or never understood that politics is the art of addition, not subtraction.Yes, he has a fiercely loyal base that he can count on — but there are not enough of those voters to win in an election where all the anti-Trump voters (women, young people, minorities) will make certain this time to vote instead of staying home as they did in 2016.

He has presided over a decent economy, yet his approval numbers are anemic. Why? Because America is filled with decent people who abhor his indecent behavior and, frankly, don’t understand it.Not only will he lose on Nov. 3, but the GOP will lose the Senate, too. Arizona, Colorado, Iowa and Maine will go to the Democrats. Alabama will reelect former Republican Sen. Jeff Sessions. The result: A 50-50 Senate, with the newly elected Democratic vice president breaking any tie.Thus, the Trump era will end — and be seen in history as a four-year aberration that began with a fluke election in 2016 that the American voter then systematically corrected in 2018 and 2020.John LeBoutillier, a former Republican congressman from New York, co-hosts “ Revolution — The Podcast,” available on Soundcloud and iTunes.



To: FJB who wrote (1189846)1/2/2020 11:11:05 AM
From: sylvester801 Recommendation

Recommended By
pocotrader

  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1576929
 
BOMBSHELL: 2020 WILL BE THE WORST YEAR OF TRUMP'S LYING CORRUPT LIFE
latimes.com



To: FJB who wrote (1189846)1/2/2020 11:13:02 AM
From: sylvester801 Recommendation

Recommended By
pocotrader

  Respond to of 1576929
 
IRAQ US EMBASSY IS A WARNING SIGN ABOUT TRUMP'S DISASTEROUS FOREIGN POLICY
huffpost.com




To: FJB who wrote (1189846)1/2/2020 11:19:25 AM
From: locogringo3 Recommendations

Recommended By
bruwin
FJB
Mick Mørmøny

  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 1576929
 
2020 WORST EVER??

2016 Impeachment begins. Not a conspiracy theory...all on the record.

2017 Fake Russian Collusion and Obstruction of Justice.

2018 Special Prosecutor finds NOTHING and exonerated Mr Trump 100% and vindicated Mr Trump 100%

2019 Trump impeached...kind of... but still is President and the most powerful man in the world as the fakepress and their lemmings whimper, whine, snivel and throw temper tantrums.

2020 Landslide re-election for Mr Trump, retakes the House and Increase the Senate. 1 or 2 more Supreme Court Justices. The "Trump White House being bugged" will finally show indictments by Durham.

Worst ever bombshell sounds pretty fucking exciting! Most of you freaks of nature won't make it.