SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : The Trump Presidency -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: i-node who wrote (148994)1/4/2020 9:39:47 PM
From: combjelly  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 360995
 
Right. And no other banks got indicted for the same thing. But it was just regular business. Could have happened to anyone...

I didn't say Trump was involved with the money laundering. It does illustrate that DB was not opposed to doing shady things.

But is there ACTUALLY any evidence tying TRUMP in any way to this money laundering thing?

No idea. It could be the case. Or not. We don't know. What seems to be the case is that Trump is/was involved with the Russians more than he has admitted to. Given his denials, it seems like it should be something to investigate.

I am not assuming that Trump was involved in the money laundering. You are making that part up. Like you often do...