SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Sex, Lies, and Audiotape, or . . . -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: PAL who wrote (56)1/24/1998 3:41:00 PM
From: John M Connolly  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 94
 
" I do not want the Prez to be a saint , just do a good job for the country"
You jest of course! We have a liar with no moral character who like to make out with girls the age of his daughter.
He has made thiscountry the laughing stock of the world, in one breath he is talking family values and children the next he is getting oral sex from a 21 year old.
In other countries when this happens you are expected to resign in disgrace that is what he should do. Most of the current problems of this country are related to character and moral fibre, which we really deserve, as you ( not me ) put him in office and he has got neither.
Please understand I am not against 50 year olds trying to make it with 21 year olds - if you get lucky go for it. But when you are the President of the Greatest country in the world - one expects
that you can keep your Pecker in your pants and not hit on interns who by definition have been entrusted to you.
John



To: PAL who wrote (56)1/24/1998 4:58:00 PM
From: Diane  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 94
 
I don't think it's fair to judge George W. by the actions of his father or brother, any more than it would be to judge Chelsea by the action of her father. Judge him on his own record please.

I don't expect a "saint", but I do expect someone I can trust and respect, and Clinton does not fit that bill.



To: PAL who wrote (56)1/25/1998 2:32:00 PM
From: Dave Walp  Respond to of 94
 
(why did not he finish S Hussein?)

Rightly or wrongly, the UN resolution (under which the US agreed to function in order to gain alliance of world nations) called ONLY for throwing IRAQ out of Kuwait. Hindsight says this was inadequate, but that was the operable rule at that time.

Davw Walp