To: ro33 who wrote (1193447 ) 1/15/2020 11:42:11 AM From: RetiredNow 2 RecommendationsRecommended By locogringo Winfastorlose
Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1573749 Suleimani orchestrated the Benghazi attack, which resulted in the capture, torture, and killing of our Ambassador Chris Stevens. For that alone, the long arm of American Justice was justified according to International Law to target Suleimani. Your argument is quite ridiculous, of course. Osama Bin Ladin was holed up in a safe house and there were no imminent attacks that we knew about when Osama was taken out, but no one would agree with you if you tried to say Obama broke the law in targeting him. Osama was a threat simply being alive, because he had become an icon of terror. It was what he stood for. Suleimani was different only in that he was a member of Iran's IRGC and was a state sponsored terrorist leader. Suleimani's existence was to foment terror in the region against us and our allies. Having said all that, let me give you some advice. The Democrat strategy that is unfolding to say that this was an illegal act and to defend Iran and to call Trump and the USA the monsters here is a failing strategy. It will make you guys look VERY bad come election time. You are basically broadcasting to all Americans that you side with the Iranian terrorist regime over the 600 US soldiers and Ambassador Stevens, who were killed by this Suleimani monster. That alone is enough to lose you the election, on top of all the other reasons you guys are giving Americans not to vote for Democrats (e.g. transgender activism, 300 genders, socialism, MMT, universal basic income, and all the other fantasy land thinking of the Democrats).