Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Heywood40 who wrote (1193504)	1/15/2020 4:19:00 PM
From: locogringo	1 Recommendation Recommended By FJB Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1575170

lo-cog ringo, have you braindead LOW IQ FatRumpLickers come up with a plausible rationale supporting ... Yes we have.

To: Heywood40 who wrote (1193504)	1/15/2020 5:28:11 PM
From: Broken_Clock	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1575170

Feb. 17, 2016 WASHINGTON — Last month, some of President Obama’s top intelligence advisers met in Silicon Valley with Apple’s chief, Timothy D. Cook, and other technology leaders in what seemed to be a public rapprochement in their long-running dispute over the encryption safeguards built into their devices. But behind the scenes, relations were tense, as lawyers for the Obama administration and Apple held closely guarded discussions for over two months about one particularly urgent case: The F.B.I. wanted Apple to help “unlock” an iPhone used by one of the two attackers who killed 14 people in San Bernardino, Calif., in December, but Apple was resisting.