Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Strategy for Achieving Wealth and Off Topic -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Yaacov who wrote (16611)	1/24/1998 4:41:00 PM
From: Sonny McWilliams	Respond to of 27012

Yaacov, yes, you are right. Pres. Clinton is deserving part of the credit and I gave it to him in my post, I think. Working together is always a good thing. And you are right again: You can end up getting what you ask for. I did not ask. gg. BTW, the majority of the people did not vote for him. He got the majority of the votes of the candidates. One more post on this which also contains the recomm. of stocks on one of our fav. stock talk show. Wall Street Week. Message 3250834 Have a nice weekend. Sonny

To: Yaacov who wrote (16611)	1/25/1998 11:52:00 PM
From: Richard L. Williams	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 27012

So, the majority of Americans voted for an adulterer, a draft-doger, a lier, and dope head, if we have to believe the press!! Correct me if I am wrong, but in 1992, Mr. Clinton was elected with 42% of the vote, and in 1996 he was reelected with 48 or 49% of the vote. So in reality, President Clinton has never received a majority vote, merely a plurality vote. A fine point, to be sure, but considering the last president to be elected by a plurality was in the 1880's or so, I think it shows that he didn't fool all that many people, really. cheers! Rick