Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : The Trump Presidency -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: combjelly who wrote (150447)	1/20/2020 5:21:06 AM
From: i-node	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 359703

>>Lots of things "could" be the case. In that election, there were several key elections that were very narrow wins for Trump that could have easily gone the other way. In all of those cases, the final results were within the margin of error of the polls. The polls weren't wrong. There were a couple of squeakers as there are in almost every presidential election. On both sides. Some were within the MoE, which was as-designed by the Trump administration. The entire strategy of the Trump campaign was to win districts that were exceptionally close and could change the election outcome. That is a cost effective campaign and the reason Trump could operate with a fraction of the budget. How you try to turn that into a negative I just don’t know. The guy who runs a campaign with that efficiency sounds like a winner to me.