Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Brumar89 who wrote (1194807)	1/25/2020 8:56:57 AM
From: RetiredNow	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1571655

Is it now? And what of the very real corruption that has been amply discovered in the process the FBI used to spy on Trump? Remember, the FBI was in coordination with Obama and Hillary during the 2016 election. FBI agents like Strokz said they had an "insurance policy" against Trump getting elected. They very clearly meddled in the US 2016 election and then turned around and blamed Trump for conspiring with Russia to meddle. The Democrats have redefined the words hypocrisy and irony to mean "do what I say, not what I do" or maybe you like this better, "Only I will commit crimes and then I will accuse you for what I did, so that I can claim you are playing retaliatory politics when you rightfully accuse me of the crimes I actually committed". ----------- DOJ: Surveillance Of Carter Page Based On Insufficient Evidence, No Probable Cause The Department of Justice has concluded that the Obama-era FBI should have discontinued its surveillance of Trump campaign adviser Carter Page far earlier than they did, and that the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) court was shown insufficient evidence to show that Page was a foreign spy, according to the Wall Street Journal. The DOJ delivered its conclusion to the FISA court in December filing unsealed on Thursday. The Justice Department now appears to have concluded that there was “”insufficient predication to establish probable cause” in the last two renewals in 2017. Probable cause is the legal standard to obtain a secret warrant against suspected agents of a foreign power. The letter is classified, but is referenced in a new order declassified by a judge on Thursday. The Justice Department said it would sequester all the material it collected against Mr. Page pending further internal review of the matter. - Wall Street Journal "The court understands the government to have concluded, in view of the material misstatements and omissions, that the court's authorizations in (two applications) were not valid," wrote Judge James Emanuel Boasberg, a federal district judge in Washington who also sits on the FISA court. As The Federalist notes, this could have far-reaching consequences for special counsel Robert Mueller's findings. "The final warrant against Page overlapped with former special counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation of Russian interference in the 2016 election. The final three-month authorization to spy on Page was signed nearly six weeks after Mueller was appointed, meaning that Mueller may have had real-time access to and utilized nearly five months worth of surveillance of Page during the course of Mueller’s investigation. If his office used any of the information in subsequent cases, the declaration that the final two spy warrants against Page were invalid could potentially nullify previous or future convictions sought by Mueller’s office." Sean Davis?@seanmdavIn a blockbuster ruling, the FISA court declared that least two of the four Carter Page spy warrants were illegal, meaning ANY evidence collected from that surveillance is now invalid.This could have huge implications for every case brought by Mueller. thefederalist.com …FISA Court Admits Spy Warrants Against Carter Page Were 'Not Valid'The FISA court's top judge wrote in a secret ruling on January 7 that at least two of the four spy warrants against Carter Page were invalid and not lawfully authorized. -thefederalist.com Judge Boasberg set a Jan. 28 deadline for the government to show the court what steps they have taken to avoid similar abuses in the future.