Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: chronicle who wrote (1195184)	1/22/2020 6:12:11 PM
From: Tenchusatsu	2 Recommendations Recommended By locogringo Thomas A Watson Respond to of 1575844

Chronicle, Only goes to show how flawed the American constitution is. You mean this document that even Democrats swore to uphold? Funny how the Democrats love to wave the Constitution around until it obstructs their agenda. Then all of a sudden it becomes a "flawed document." If it weren't for double-standards, liberals would have no standards. Tenchusatsu

To: chronicle who wrote (1195184)	1/22/2020 8:37:08 PM
From: longnshort	3 Recommendations Recommended By Bill FJB locogringo Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1575844

you are insane

To: chronicle who wrote (1195184)	1/22/2020 8:49:04 PM
From: Maple MAGA	1 Recommendation Recommended By FJB Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1575844

Today, when a concerted effort is made to obliterate this point, it cannot be repeated too often that the Constitution is a limitation on the government, not on private individuals—that it does not prescribe the conduct of private individuals, only the conduct of the government—that it is not a charter for government power, but a charter of the citizens’ protection against the government. Ours was the first government based on and strictly limited by a written document—the Constitution—which specifically forbids it to violate individual rights or to act on whim. The history of the atrocities perpetrated by all the other kinds of governments—unrestricted governments acting on unprovable assumptions—demonstrates the value and validity of the original political theory on which this country was built. A complex legal system, based on objectively valid principles, is required to make a society free and to keep it free—a system that does not depend on the motives, the moral character or the intentions of any given official, a system that leaves no opportunity, no legal loophole for the development of tyranny. The American system of checks and balances was just such an achievement. And although certain contradictions in the Constitution did leave a loophole for the growth of statism, the incomparable achievement was the concept of a constitution as a means of limiting and restricting the power of the government. Ayn Rand