Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : A Real American President: Donald Trump -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: FJB who wrote (182831)	1/24/2020 6:02:42 PM
From: FJB	4 Recommendations Recommended By AJ Muckenfus Honey_Bee locogringo Woody_Nickels Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 455809

Senate GOP doesn't want witnesses. But what if they have to have them? Growing sense that House Dems have opened door wide for calling Hunter Biden. 'Not only relevant, now critical,' says GOP senator. Also: What about whistleblower? https://t.co/ySpuF497u5 — Byron York (@ByronYork) January 24, 2020 From the Washington Examiner: Another GOP senator, Josh Hawley, told Fox News’s Special Report, “If we call witnesses, I think the House has made it very clear, we’re going to have to call Hunter Biden and probably Joe Biden.” “Hunter Biden is not only relevant, he is now critical,” Republican Sen. Ted Cruz said. “That was a very odd strategic decision from the House managers.” And Democrats do NOT want them calling Hunter. None of that means Republicans would love to call Hunter Biden or his father. They’d rather there be no witnesses at all. As all the Biden talk was happening, another GOP senator said, “At the end of this, we will move to summary judgment. I don’t think we will have witnesses.” But Thursday’s developments do mean there is increasing Republican consensus on the Biden option. This could real interesting real fast … Link: In witness debate, growing GOP focus on Hunter Biden; some press for whistleblower. https://t.co/T3crduVSWA — Byron York (@ByronYork) January 24, 2020 1) Because HBiden goes to validity of Trump's Ukraine concerns. Why do you think Ds have said over and over that HBiden allegation is baseless? 2) Because Senate cannot pass judgment on case whose origins are shrouded in mystery. https://t.co/xjCWMmFg6v https://t.co/aOAzgrsIjV — Byron York (@ByronYork) January 24, 2020 Senate Republicans hold all the cards, folks. Sorry, not sorry.