To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (1195736 ) 1/24/2020 9:32:19 PM From: Wharf Rat 1 RecommendationRecommended By pocotrader
Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1576605 This is science...The report finds that limiting global warming to 1.5°C would require “rapid and far-reaching” transitions in land, energy, industry, buildings, transport, and cities. Global net human-caused emissions of carbon dioxide (CO2) would need to fall by about 45 percent from 2010 levels by 2030, reaching ‘net zero’ around 2050. This means that any remaining emissions would need to be balanced by removing CO2 from the air. ipcc.ch So is this: New climate models suggest Paris goals may be out of reach January 14, 2020m.phys.org "The solutions to climate change can be pursued without alarmism" That's like saying the solution to fires can be pursued without alarmism, and yet, "where Environmentalism isn't hijacked by the very socialists that you claim to oppose." You mean where science isn't hijacked by capitalists brainwashing you. At the heart of big coal’s denial campaign was Fred Palmer, who served as Peabody’s senior vice president of government relations from 2001 to 2015. In 1997, Palmer founded the Greening Earth Society, a now-defunct industry front group that argued that burning fossil fuels was good for the planet. The group was based in the same office as the Western Fuels Association, a consortium of coal suppliers and coal-fired utilities that Palmer also ran. “Every time you turn your car on and you burn fossil fuels and you put CO2 into the air, you’re doing the work of the Lord,” Palmer told a Danish documentary team in 1997. “That’s the ecological system we live in.”Message 32431552 Do you have the balls to be honest and say "The bottom line is that it's not that I don't know. It's just that I don't want to care"