SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : C-Cube -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Stoctrash who wrote (28703)1/25/1998 10:30:00 AM
From: John Rieman  Respond to of 50808
 
MMDS...............................................................

cedmagazine.com

By Jeffrey Krauss, wireless cable wiring expert and President of Telecommunications and Technology Policy

The wireless cable folks have been busy lately, figuring out how to configure their one-way spectrum to carry two-way services. One element of their plan was to get the FCC to change the technical rules for wireless cable, and that is now underway. But they still have to convince the FCC and the people who hold the radio licenses that this can be done without causing interference.

Wireless cable background

Wireless cable operates in the 2500-2690 MHz range. It is comprised of two kinds of radio licenses, Multichannel Multipoint Distribution Service (MMDS) and Instructional Fixed Television Service (ITFS). The ITFS licensees are educational institutions that use the channels for distributing educational coursework and lectures, but they are permitted to lease their "excess capacity" for pay TV distribution by a wireless cable operator. In most cities, the wireless cable service--up to 31 channels of MMDS and ITFS--is operated by the MMDS licensee.

Until now, wireless cable has used a one-way broadcast configuration from a tall tower in order to reach customers as far as 35 miles away. That's efficient for broadcasting, but not for two-way operations.

Last year, the FCC decided to allow wireless cable operators to transmit digital video as well as traditional analog video. This was permitted only after extensive field testing, to show that the digital signals would not cause interference into the traditional analog video transmissions. But even though this was a significant change, the broadcast video nature of wireless cable was retained. That clearly will not be the case if two-way services are permitted.

The two-way proposal

The FCC released a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking in October, in response to a petition submitted by a large group of wireless cable licensees, operators and equipment suppliers, seeking to establish new technical rules that would make it feasible to provide some two-way operations on ITFS/MMDS channels. These are some elements of the proposal:

permit use of ITFS/MMDS channels for response (two-way) communications permit cellular reuse of ITFS/MMDS frequencies permit licensees to subchannelize the 6 MHz channels or combine them into wider channels permit use of sector antenna systems in addition to omnidirectional antennas require submission of detailed calculations of potential interference from "response stations."

If these technical proposals are approved, 2.5 GHz wireless cable networks could end up looking like 28 GHz LMDS networks, with numerous small cells instead of a single, large, 35-mile coverage radius. But LMDS will have a single licensee in each city, while wireless cable uses ITFS channels licensed to four or five educational institutions in addition to the MMDS channels. The problem here is going to be maintaining the ITFS and MMDS broadcast video service on some channels, while operating two-way services on other channels.

The initial comments from ITFS licensees on the proposals were mixed. Some would be happy to abandon or decrease the video coursework and use their channels for Internet access and other two-way data services. But a significant number of ITFS licensees want to retain the video distribution nature of the service. They are concerned that a cellularized two-way network may not be suitable for one-way video.

There are serious interference issues. The propagation features of 28 GHz LMDS support cellular reuse of all the spectrum at every cell. In contrast, the 800 MHz cellular mobile telephone service can reuse only about one-seventh of the spectrum at each cell, because of interference from transmission in one cell into receivers in the adjacent cell. It remains to be seen whether similar interference problems will have an impact on two-way wireless cable at 2.5 GHz.

In addition, there are questions about interference between one-way video transmissions and two-way wireless cable. There will be some ITFS licensees that won't want to replace their one-way broadcast transmitters with these cellular two-way systems. So they'll be blasting away at the maximum power needed to send their video signal 35 miles, while on the adjacent channel, there will be systems using much lower power transmissions for cellularized two-way services. It will be quite a challenge to design a two-way wireless cable network that both achieves large frequency reuse and also is robust against interference from high-power ITFS.

The wireless cable folks would like the FCC to re-allocate the spectrum and kick out the ITFS folks, just like the FCC kicked out the private microwave users in order to clear spectrum for PCS. But that isn't in the cards, and everyone knows it. The educational institutions may not have much money, but they have political clout through the Congress, and they've used it in the past to hold onto these frequencies.

In return for allowing the FCC to create the wireless cable service, educational institutions have promoted the idea that the wireless cable operators should pay for new ITFS transmission equipment and should pay for leasing channel capacity from the ITFS licensees. But that took place when everyone had the same goal of broadcasting video programming. It remains to be seen what kind of Christmas present it will take to sweeten the pot this time around for the educational institutions that want to use their ITFS channels for one-way video.



To: Stoctrash who wrote (28703)1/25/1998 10:58:00 AM
From: John Rieman  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 50808
 
March 1997.....................................................

cedmagazine.com

By Roger Brown

------------------------------------------------------------------------

PITY THE POOR CABLE TV set-top box. For at least the past 10 years, everyone from consumers to legislators have been trying to rid the planet of the devices, but "the box" that resides on top of millions of TVs refuses to go away. They have remained ubiquitous simply because of their utility--first as a way for operators to offer more than 13 channels, then as a method to provide volume control. Now, the newest thing is the digital set-top, and this time, it's bringing more than just TV. This computer on top of a TV is a true service enabler.

Cable operators were the first video providers to boldly announce that they were embracing the digital revolution and would offer the equivalent of a 500-channel universe. They were beaten to the punch by DBS providers, but, true to form, operators are now rolling out digital boxes that are so fully featured, they promise to rewrite the way systems roll out new services.

General Instrument is now about six months into its production cycle for the DCT1000 digital set-top, and has shipped roughly 200,000 units to several MSOs, including Tele-Communications Inc., Cox Communications, Comcast and several others that prefer not to be identified for competitive reasons, according to Denton Kanouff, vice president of marketing at GI's digital network systems business unit.

Waiting in the wings to take its bow is Scientific-Atlanta, which won a major contract from Time Warner Cable to deploy the "Explorer 2000" set-top, which features real-time reverse for interactivity.

And of course, Zenith is busy developing and manufacturing a digital set-top for the Americast consortium of telephone companies, while Hewlett-Packard is awaiting an opportunity to show its stuff. And finally, companies like Pioneer, Toshiba and Pace Technologies are now signing up as licensees of either GI or S-A to second-source set-tops, now that the industry has developed a standard set-top design around the MPEG-2 protocol.

Not plug-and-play, yet

Predictably, TCI and some of the other operators are still getting used to deploying the new-fangled digital boxes. Although the nation's largest MSO is rolling out in Hartford, Conn., the process is still far from plug-and-play installs, according to one source familiar with the roll-out, who asked not to be identified.

Nevertheless, there are no major concerns, according to Kanouff, who reports that the roll-out is progressing "very well." In fact, by the time this article is read, GI will have shipped 200,000 set-tops and installed at least 30 digital headends, he adds.

In fact, GI believes the market has already matured a little--at least to the point where a wider range of digital products can be supported. That's why the company intends to show two new digital set-tops at this month's National Cable Show in New Orleans.

Slated for debut are a new, broadcast-only box that could sell for $50 less per unit than the DCT-1000, and a new, "advanced interactive" box that will sport a next-generation microprocessor and a TDMA-based return channel that is more conducive to file transfers and session-oriented gaming, Kanouff says.

These set-tops are so new that names hadn't even been decided for them by the time Kanouff was interviewed for this story.

In the meantime, S-A is busy developing the Explorer 2000 for Time Warner, who bought 550,000 set-tops, all headend and network control software and system integration expertise from the Atlanta-based manufacturer and expects to begin deploying units by the end of 1997. This unit features real-time reverse and has been built from a data-centric point of view, according to Bob Van Orden, S-A's Digital Video Systems business unit director. "We focused our efforts on (helping operators) build a digital network to match DBS first, while providing a platform to offer even more services," he says.

S-A isn't going to be as aggressive as its arch-rival in its plans to offer a suite of digital products, says Van Orden. He says S-A has no intention to pursue the low-end portion of the market.

Instead, S-A's efforts will be focused toward designing cost out of the box components. But that doesn't mean anyone will soon see a less-expensive device--instead, buyers will end up getting more features, greater graphics and better processors for their money.

<Picture>

Included in the Time Warner purchase is the PowerTV set-top operating system, which recently announced a new release of its software that supports near-video-on-demand applications, secure digital broadcasting and a host of other audio and Internet Protocol compliant features. Release 1.1 especially adds more Internet capability--the company has already worked with Spyglass to develop a Web browser and has shown a complete Java environment operating over the new software release. "We have made significant improvements over the past 12 months that will make advanced television applications even easier and more powerful to implement," says J. Bowmar Rodgers Jr., chief operating officer at PowerTV.

The new release builds on PowerTV's first offering, which was specifically designed for the set-top and advanced TV applications. That release was small in footprint, yet offered advanced graphics support, especially when married with the company's Eagle graphics chip.

Some new faces, too

Included in the Time Warner deal were orders for S-A licensees Pioneer and Toshiba, who intend to provide a total of 450,000 more set-tops based on the S-A/PowerTV platform.

But GI also has a few licensees that stand poised to build digital set-tops for the burgeoning market. Just last month, Pace Micro Technology plc, a London-based manufacturer of set-top hardware, licensed GI's MPEG-2 system, including its DigiCipher II conditional access system.

ÿ<Picture>
Necessary

ÿ<Picture>
Van Orden

Pace, which is already producing DVB-compliant receivers for deployment in Europe, intends to pursue the U.S. cable TV market as a second-source of GI hardware. Pace officials recently disclosed that they have been holding exploratory discussions with MSOs and can now move forward with development, with an eye toward having product available by the end of 1997, according to a statement released by the company.

Apparently left out in the cold, at least for now, is Hewlett-Packard, which made quite a splash a couple of years ago by licensing the GI system for its Kayak set-top. In fact, HP had a letter of intent from TCI to purchase roughly 250,000 boxes. But, to date, that agreement has not advanced beyond the LOI stage.

"Our fate rests in the hands of the cable operators," says Casey Sheldon, brand manager for interactive broadband products at HP. She says cable operators' digital deployment plans are apparently in flux, given that even TCI issued a request for proposals as late as last October seeking a set-top that would pass through analog signals offered by TCI, and receive Primestar digital signals as well.

"We responded in depth to that," says Sheldon. "Cable operators seem to be changing their plans--their thinking has changed. We simply need to know what they want."

But Sheldon is quick to point out that the demand for more service offerings hasn't fallen off. "We don't see consumer interest waning at all," she says. But while cable operators go back to the drawing board to decide if high-speed data or digital video is the key priority for their new-service rollouts, HP is content to wait.

"We have become masters of living with ambiguity," Sheldon says light-heartedly. "We are eager to get started, but willing to wait."

Are the MSOs ready?

So, if the vendors are ready and willing to provide product, what are the operators' plans?

While TCI and Time Warner have made very public announcements about backing off their telephony plans, digital TV deployment continues to be a high priority for them. At TCI, which has been suffering lately through severe economic hardships, digital TV has become the number-one project.

In fact, while TCI intends to do less telephony, it will more than make up for it by deploying digital video systems, according to insiders. Internally, TCI engineers are working to understand everything they can about digital bitstreams and how they are affected by cable networks. Once those parameters are understood, TCI will roll out digital boxes in a vast majority of its systems, an inside source said recently.

The rest of the Top 5 MSOs, which control the lion's share of the cable subscribers, also have aggressive rollout plans. Cox, for example, plans to place digital set-tops in front of about 5 percent of its subscriber base by the end of 1997, and will double that to 10 percent by the end of 1998, according to Alex Best, senior vice president of engineering at Cox.

At the same time, analog addressable box purchases will fall from 350,000 units to about 200,000 next year, Best says.

US West/Continental Cablevision hasn't yet publicly disclosed its digital rollout plans in detail, but is rumored to be close to deals with both GI and S-A for purchase orders, which could be announced by the National Show.

Naturally, cable operators say the digital roll-out would accelerate with a more aggressive pricetag attached to the set-tops. While some cost reduction can be expected from greater integration that will reduce chip counts and make manufacturing more efficient, as Van Orden noted earlier in this article, the industry shouldn't expect a $200 box anytime soon. But that doesn't mean the operators won't continue to press for one.

<Picture>

"I don't see why they should be greater than $200 apiece," says Best. "Depending on the bells and whistles, they can be twice that today. We need multiple suppliers, and of course, the vendors have to come down the learning curve. So, I'm optimistic that someday we'll get there."

Someday got a lot closer when the industry managed to hammer out a standard late last year that allows cable operators to populate their systems with digital set-tops from multiple vendors. By separating the core encryption and access control from the modulation, compression and signal transport layers, a system can purchase set-tops from rival companies and have them work in the same system.

Driving costs down

But perhaps more importantly, the standard will attract additional manufacturers, which creates competition and lowers prices for end-users.

The interoperability spec "helps in a couple of ways," notes GI's Kanouff. "Standards in the industry drive the market and drive costs down, because component companies are more willing to jump in and build things (when) the market is expanded."

As for other manufacturers, Zenith is occupied developing and manufacturing digital set-tops for the Americast consortium. The Chicago-based electronics firm has teamed with Divicom to build an MPEG-2 based, QAM box for the telcos.

Meanwhile, the other, nearly defunct consortium, Tele-TV, will have to renegotiate its contract with Thomson, now that Bell Atlantic and Nynex have abandoned their plans to offer video using MMDS technology.

Reportedly, Tele-TV took delivery of only about 200,000 set-tops out of an order that was originally projected to total as many as 4 million units.

According to one source inside the company, however, set-top development efforts within Tele-TV continue. Specifically, Bell Atlantic needs a set-top for its fiber-to-the-curb system it plans to build next year. Tele-TV has reportedly chosen the vendor for the box, but hasn't yet disclosed who it is.

Even analog wins

Despite all the movement--finally--on the digital front, new, advanced analog boxes remain popular among operators and will continue to be for some time, according to Steve Necessary, vice president and general manager of analog video systems at S-A.

In short, cable operators are less hesitant to place a set-top on top of a customer's TV because they offer so many new services, including messaging, virtual channels, on-screen guides and more.

"A year ago, all of that was wishful thinking" (that customers would see the value of these new boxes), admits Necessary. "Now we have some pretty good, hard facts to support it."



To: Stoctrash who wrote (28703)1/25/1998 10:24:00 PM
From: CPAMarty  Respond to of 50808
 
PBOC increases control over banking system
asia1.com.sg
Central bank also shuts down branches; moves seen partly as response to Asian crisis

C
HINA's central bank has decided to step up the supervision of the banking system and shut down its own provincial branches to increase central control, the official Xinhua news agency said yesterday.

The moves were attributed partly to the Asian financial crisis which has crushed several regional currencies and stock markets since erupting in July.

"Although the South-east Asian financial crisis does not seem to pose a direct threat to China, the hidden dangers that led to the crisis also exist to some degree in China's financial sector, and the central bank has taken heed and decided to further increase financial controls," the report said.

As part of its plan, the central bank, the People's Bank of China (PBOC), will gradually close its roughly 30 provincial branches, and instead set up a smaller number of regional branches, to strengthen the central bank's control over its branches.

The move is expected to diminish the influence of provincial level government officials in bank lending. It is partly aimed at giving commercial banks a freer hand in determining who they lend to, based on credit considerations.

The official news agency said the move represents Chinese authorities' determination to push ahead with national economic reforms, including financial sector reforms. "The ultimate goal of the new round of reforms is a modern financial system and a sound financial order over the next three years," Xinhua said.

The central bank will draw on the experience of other international central banks, as it tries to increase its authority and independence from political considerations, and become more professional and sophisticated, the agency said.

China will also press ahead with plans to shut down local branches of state-owned commercial banks that are not performing well, the agency said.

As part of its ongoing attempt to improve the creditworthiness of commercial banks' borrowers, China will develop a new system of classifying loans, in line with international standards.

It will seek to create "a modern banking system established with boards of directors, and internal control systems", the agency reported.

The country will also try to establish its own mutual funds to channel individual savings into those enterprises "with a good record", Xinhua said.

China will continue to gradually press ahead with plans to make its currency, the yuan, convertible under the capital account, despite the Asian financial crisis, the agency pledged. -- AFP