Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: ro33 who wrote (1196093)	1/26/2020 7:01:40 AM
From: Winfastorlose	2 Recommendations Recommended By FJB longnshort Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1575853

He is on trial. As well he should be. Lying Schitty was the mastermind of the sham. You would think Schiff was on trial.

To: ro33 who wrote (1196093)	1/26/2020 8:46:17 AM
From: longnshort	1 Recommendation Recommended By FJB Respond to of 1575853

he should be that lying sack of shit traitor

To: ro33 who wrote (1196093)	1/26/2020 8:50:08 AM
From: longnshort	3 Recommendations Recommended By FJB locogringo Winfastorlose Respond to of 1575853

Rep. Jim Jordan Delivers Knockout Blow to Schiff’s Reputation - Gregg Jarrett 8 thegreggjarrett During a press gaggle on the second day of the Senate impeachment trial, Rep. Jim Jordan eviscerated the credibility of Rep. Adam Schiff in front of the media. Rather than speaking for hours and actually saying nothing, like Rep. Schiff has been doing for the last two days, Rep. Jordan was able to lay out the case for why Rep. Schiff should never be trusted even as a pizza delivery boy in under a minute. The media should take note that when actual evidence of wrongdoing is present, it does not take three days of continually repeating the same statements that you have been saying for the last three months. “We’re supposed to believe Adam Schiff today and everything he’s saying? This is the guy who said, ‘We have more than circumstantial evidence that there was coordination between Trump and Russia, and Russia influenced the election.’ That turned out to be false. Adam Schiff said that the Nunes was false. Michael Horowitz told us no it wasn’t; it was exactly right. Adam Schiff said you can trust the FISA court. Michael Horowitz said last month that no, you can’t; they lied to the FISA court 17 times. Adam Schiff told us we look forward to hearing from the whistleblower. Adam Schiff said we’ve had no contact with the whistleblower. Then just yesterday, the story where he misrepresents to all of you … that Mr. Z is Mr. Zelensky, when in fact it was Mr. Zlochevsky. But today we’re supposed to believe him? He just talked for two hours, 15 minutes, and we’re supposed to believe everything he said today, in spite of that history, where seven important things he had exactly wrong!?… That’s the kind of game that they’re playing here, and, again, I think that the American people see through it all.” With Schiff’s desire to be a film writer, and the media’s encouragement, it seems he likely is viewing himself as Mel Gibson’s Braveheart character. Unfortunately for him, he actually is Bill Murray’s character in Caddyshack. Rep. Jim Jordan ?@Jim_Jordan Schiff: -"More than circumstantial evidence" of collusion -Nunes memo was false -FISA process was fine -The "Whistleblower" would testify -"We haven't spoken... with the 'Whistleblower'" -Parodied @POTUS' call -"Mr. Z" referred to Zelensky But today we're supposed to trust him?