Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : A Real American President: Donald Trump -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: locogringo who wrote (183956)	1/29/2020 8:42:04 PM
From: FJB	2 Recommendations Recommended By Honey_Bee locogringo Respond to of 455260

Adam Schiff lied to Sam Stein's face, so why is Stein cleaning up his mess? https://t.co/WZyTbyny8f — Sean Davis (@seanmdav) January 29, 2020 Just because Adam Schiff lied to your face about coordinating with the whistleblower, whom @RCI identified as Eric Ciaramella, and you took it doesn't mean you have to keep covering for him. https://t.co/J1FgYk0AGY — Sean Davis (@seanmdav) January 29, 2020 So, which one is it? pic.twitter.com/bvjvojyVH6 — The White House (@WhiteHouse) January 29, 2020 🚨 NEW - declaration from Gen. Flynn: "I did not lie." He was mindful of the need to "protect sensitive or classified information." He knew the Kislyak calls were recorded.https://t.co/w5uC9ovCEb pic.twitter.com/mNv4kImS9v — Techno Fog (@Techno_Fog) January 29, 2020

To: locogringo who wrote (183956)	1/29/2020 8:43:11 PM
From: FJB	3 Recommendations Recommended By CF Rebel Honey_Bee locogringo Respond to of 455260

Adam Schiff once promised the American people that Congress would hear from the "whistleblower." Then he and his staff got caught coordinating with this individual before the complaint had gone public. Adam Schiff once promised the American people that Congress would hear from the "whistleblower." Then he and his staff got caught coordinating with this individual before the complaint had gone public. https://t.co/YRgS01OcCf — Rep Andy Biggs (@RepAndyBiggsAZ) January 29, 2020 After lying to the Senate and refusing to answer a simple question about the whistleblower's work with Biden to protect Burisma from investigation, Schiff is now filibustering the Senate to hide the truth about the anti-Trump leaker from them. — Sean Davis (@seanmdav) January 29, 2020 Schiff also just lied to the U.S. Senate and claimed he has no idea who the anti-Trump whistleblower is. https://t.co/xyBCTAEV42 — Sean Davis (@seanmdav) January 29, 2020

To: locogringo who wrote (183956)	1/29/2020 8:45:04 PM
From: FJB	3 Recommendations Recommended By alanrs Honey_Bee locogringo Respond to of 455260

A senior GOP senate aide tells me that Justice Roberts is screening questions and that's why Rand Paul's question -- which contained names of people and questions about their interactions with Schiff and his staff -- was disallowed If true this means the SCOTUS has been even further politicized by a Chief Justice who always claims he wishes to insulate the institution from politics https://t.co/hSOG3P5sVN — Benjamin Weingarten (@bhweingarten) January 29, 2020 Question from Cruz to Schiff: The ICIG said the anti-Trump whistleblower had political bias in favor of Biden. Did the whistleblower work for or with Biden on anything related to Burisma or the firing of the Ukrainian prosecutor? Schiff refused to answer. — Sean Davis (@seanmdav) January 29, 2020

To: locogringo who wrote (183956)	1/29/2020 8:50:33 PM
From: FJB	2 Recommendations Recommended By Honey_Bee locogringo Respond to of 455260

The chief justice, who is not a member of the Senate, is censoring U.S. senators to protect the anti-Trump leaker who started the entire impeachment farce? That is wildly inappropriate. The chief justice, who is not a member of the Senate, is censoring U.S. senators to protect the anti-Trump leaker who started the entire impeachment farce? That is wildly inappropriate. https://t.co/UsU2zXdXSM — Sean Davis (@seanmdav) January 29, 2020 WARM AND CORDIAL PHONES CALL DON'T SELL BOOKS!!! Bolton wrote a book. This answer wouldn't sell. Voilà! https://t.co/iXWowbc5cx — Oversight Committee Republicans (@GOPoversight) January 29, 2020 Pretty lame how Democrats who have been demanding new witnesses are now trying to punt the decision about who testifies and how many to Chief Justice John Roberts. House dems didn't do their job before sending this to the Senate, now Senate dems don't want to do theirs. — Katie Pavlich (@KatiePavlich) January 29, 2020 I just asked @SenatorTimScott if he is open to witnesses. He said no. And I asked if he is open to getting the Bolton manuscript. He says “it will be a great book when it comes out, but no.” #nexstardc — Kellie Meyer (@KellieMeyerNews) January 29, 2020

To: locogringo who wrote (183956)	1/29/2020 8:51:44 PM
From: FJB	2 Recommendations Recommended By Honey_Bee locogringo Respond to of 455260

Excuse me, Adam Schiff. You may want to be very careful how you phrase things. "Presidents should not be in the business of asking their own Justice Department to investigate their rivals..." Excuse me, Adam Schiff. You may want to be very careful how you phrase things. "Presidents should not be in the business of asking their own Justice Department to investigate their rivals..." pic.twitter.com/wkM3n5fR5b — Tracy Beanz (@tracybeanz) January 29, 2020 WOW. @RepAdamSchiff just told the Senate presidents should not be able to ask DOJ to investigate their political rivals. Here's Schiff in April 2019, arguing in the @washingtonpost that Obama had the right and duty to do exactly that. https://t.co/QK6uYgXZap #ImpeachmentTrial https://t.co/V11cpKzvFw — Joel B. Pollak (@joelpollak) January 29, 2020