Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: J_F_Shepard who wrote (1197273)	1/30/2020 11:23:11 AM
From: longnshort	5 Recommendations Recommended By Bill FJB Maple MAGA Tenchusatsu TideGlider Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1576348

the house had witnesses

To: J_F_Shepard who wrote (1197273)	1/30/2020 11:24:30 AM
From: longnshort	6 Recommendations Recommended By FJB locogringo Maple MAGA Tenchusatsu Thomas A Watson and 1 more member Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1576348

Sekulow: "After 31 or 32 times you said you proved every aspect of your case... [pauses for response] That's what you said." Schiff: "We did." Sekulow: "Well then I don't think we need any witnesses." Sekulow:

To: J_F_Shepard who wrote (1197273)	1/30/2020 1:38:47 PM
From: Thomas A Watson	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1576348

Suggesting "Presenting science without data is like holding a trial without witnesses" Also shepie analysis above is just more amusing examples of how what you took away is based upon your stupidity of mind, the pencil neck width of your comprehension vision. Do you deny the Logarithmic effect of doubling a pasive component in a passive property. or The whole of an effect is equal to the sum of the parts of an effect in a passive process. Do you know that if you deny you are saying ohms law is false. We all want to see your peer reviewed paper on that. LOL.... cowardly anonymous lying asshole shepie. what I have learned from your post of what you took away is confirmation of my proffer shepie is a science, technology, engineering, manufacturing, farming and economic imbecile. Consider is CO2 doubling follows a logarithmic effect. The h20 does likewise. h20 absorption competes with CO2 at every frequency CO2 does absorption. What does dew point tell one about how many time H20 doubles. What is the effect of CO2 against the sub daily and even sub hourly emergent effect of many doubling of H20. And this is all too esoteric for you to have a clue. And what ppm of CO2 caused the first 1 degree impact of CO2. How many times from that ppm has it doubled already? What is used in the fantasy climate models. Logarithmic effect doubling means 1 .5 .25 .125 .0625 .0312 .0016 what defines h20 ppm. dew point. I did all the analysis to compute the data that make up this graph. I authored it. And it is provided to all. agwn.homeip.net has the spreadsheet that encode goff graph or bolton empirical curve fit equations