SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: locogringo who wrote (1198914)2/5/2020 2:27:19 PM
From: Mongo21163 Recommendations

Recommended By
pocotrader
rdkflorida2
sylvester80

  Read Replies (4) | Respond to of 1574002
 
WATCH LIVE: Sen. Mitt Romney will vote to remove Trump from office, becoming only Republican to do so

By CHRIS SOMMERFELDT

NEW YORK DAILY NEWS |
FEB 05, 2020 | 2:10 PM

Utah Sen. Mitt Romney announced Wednesday that he will vote to remove President Trump from office, becoming the only Republican to do so.

Romney made the stunning announcement in a floor speech before the Senate is expected to vote on the two articles of impeachment around 4 p.m.

“The grave question the Constitution tasked senators to answer is whether the president committed an act so extreme and egregious that it rises to the level of a high crime and misdemeanor,” Romney said. “Yes, he did ... Corrupting an election to keep oneself in office is perhaps the most abusive and destructive violation of one’s oath of office that I can imagine."

ONE REPUBLICAN WITH BALLS



To: locogringo who wrote (1198914)2/5/2020 4:30:56 PM
From: bruwin2 Recommendations

Recommended By
locogringo
Thomas A Watson

  Respond to of 1574002
 
With regard to the "Chaotic Iowa" vote count and App Crap ....

Here's my take ....

The App was an "insurance policy" for the DNC SWAMP Hierarchy in case the wrong guy, i.e. Bernie Sanders, got the Votes and be a CLEAR WINNER.

In such a relatively small constituency there was no need for any "fancy App". There could quite easily have been a hand count of the votes right from the start. Back in the United Kingdom VIRTUALLY ALL VOTES THAT TAKE PLACE FOR ANY SIZE OF ELECTION ARE HAND COUNTED and the results are known in a very short space of time.

But to have had only a hand count in Iowa would have meant virtually NO CHANCE OF "RIGGING" ANYTHING IF THE VOTES WERE GOING TO THE WRONG CANDIDATE ....

.... so there had to be this "Electronic Safeguard" that could be "blamed" for "something going wrong" .... "something" that couldn't be fixed in a hurry ..... "something" that gave the SWAMP time to ensure that the WRONG GUY DIDN'T WIN WITHOUT IT REALLY BEING POSSIBLE FOR ANYONE TO PROVE OTHERWISE, OR TO WANT TO PROVE OTHERWISE, and in so doing prove something VERY DETRIMENTAL TO "THE PARTY".