To: Doug R who wrote (2991 ) 2/14/2020 12:58:32 AM From: Doug R 1 RecommendationRecommended By DinoNavarre
Respond to of 6337 “All right, people, we want to inflate case numbers in the epidemic. How do we do it? Forget testing for the coronavirus. How about this? We run a test for ‘the epidemic disease’, pneumonia. If any kind of pneumonia turns up positive, we’ll just SAY this is a case of coronavirus, with no proof. Any objections? Good. Get busy.” Mainstream news outlets are reporting a spike in the number of coronavirus cases in China. The news stories also mention this sudden rise is the result of a new method of counting. NO tests for the presence of the coronavirus are now necessary, in China. Read that sentence again. The new method of counting? CT scans (computed tomography scans) of the chest . The scans are used to diagnose standard traditional lung diseases. For example, pneumonia. And pneumonia is called THE “coronavirus illness.” There is only one problem. Deaths from pneumonia, in China, appear to be 300,000 per year — which comes to 3 million per decade (I’m making a major downward estimate, based on correcting an error and referring to a trusted source.) These deaths certainly occurred in time periods before the purported emergence of the new coronavirus. Pneumonia has been around forever. Get it? A test for ordinary pneumonia—CT Scan—now becomes a test that delivers a diagnosis of “new epidemic coronavirus.” ABSURD. Ordinary pneumonia has many causes listed in medical literature—bacteria, fungi, various viruses. You can add in massively polluted air, which hangs over major Chinese cities, such as Wuhan. No “coronavirus” needed. In the rush to diagnose as many people as possible, we have this fake method of counting cases. In my 1988 book, AIDS INC. , I published the new 1987 CDC definition of AIDS. It took up 14 pages. Forcing yourself to plow through it, you would see the CDC was using every trick in the book to inflate case numbers. A person could even be diagnosed without a positive HIV test—a bizarre contradiction, since HIV was supposed to be the hallmark of AIDS. I counted about 25 diseases/infections that could be called indicators of AIDS. In every so-called epidemic, there is something called a “surveillance definition” of the disease. This is used to cast a wide net of potential symptoms and markers, in order to “identify the possibly infected and therefore contain the spread.” However, quite soon, “surveillance” and “possibly infected” are forgotten, and medical officials and reporters simply take the new expanded case numbers, yielded by the new definition, and report them as real. More grist for the propaganda mill, for inducing fear, obedience to authorities, and more profits for drug and vaccine makers. I recall that, during my research for AIDS INC., I queried the FDA about the most widely used diagnostic test for HIV, the ELISA antibody test. A positive....(more at)blog.nomorefakenews.com Along the premise of tptb having begun an intensive phase shift in efforts to, in their own way, take advantage of a sharply changing environment, many of the global effects of this pandemic narrative... ...will yield valuable data as far as various system tolerances (financial, trade, etc) ...will take out many smaller players in business ...will provide cover for drop in global food trade/availability due to sharply reduced yields (so the problem can better "sneak up" on the populace) ...will bring greater acceptance of increased surveillance since the "spread obviously escapes current methods" ...will increase general level of acceptance of the State as primary protector while the global nature of it ...will increase the general level of acceptance of a global (surveillance) State. If you were them, this is pretty much exactly what you would like to see right about now. They're even live-testing details like the control utility of drones with it.