SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks : Rocky Mountain Int'l (OTC:RMIL former OTC:OVIS) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: tonto who wrote (37985)1/25/1998 12:31:00 PM
From: Pugs  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 55532
 
It appears your "history" is equally as "questionable".
<EOM>
Pugs



To: tonto who wrote (37985)1/25/1998 12:40:00 PM
From: MY OPINION  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 55532
 
Tonto,
Is this where you got the IR packet?

DADDY

---------------------------------------------------------------------

Subject: Olympus Ventures (OLPV)

| Previous | ------ | Respond | Remove Navigation

To: +Bob Frasca (473 )
From: +michael d kugler
Monday, Dec 1 1997 6:55PM EST
Reply # of 474

Do you have the brochure on the company?
---------------------------------------------------------------------



To: tonto who wrote (37985)1/25/1998 12:40:00 PM
From: DJ Byrne  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 55532
 
tonto,

I have to disagree that the silence is one I believe is supported by all that have desired not to post, and not in anyway casts doubt on anything.

I also believe that at this point that any and all investors have made up their minds on what they are going to do, regardless of your endless postings.

Why you continue to post along with the other nays only suggests in my opinion that some still have alternative motives on getting people to sell and not to buy RMIL anymore. I'm sorry but you fall into this category.

IMO I can have doubts about you and the rest of some of the nays as to the reason why all the continuing posts, all negative and relentless.

Have a great superbowl day
dj



To: tonto who wrote (37985)1/25/1998 12:48:00 PM
From: FTJoe  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 55532
 
That would have said much for the shareholders, instead the quiet support casts doubts and that is not good for the potential short squeeze.

I don't think that's a fair statement

A) I believe some have said it is not right.
B) I've said that, at best, management has mis-stated.
C) Many folks find it tough to bash a stock they own.
D) Who in their right mind would stand up and say they are outraged given the current environment. ;-)


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News