Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Compaq -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: gc who wrote (14829)	1/25/1998 2:59:00 PM
From: WeisbrichA	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 97611

Thanks for the post. You have restored my faith in the younger generations. It is refreshing to find a savant among the increasingly morally indigent general population. RW

To: gc who wrote (14829)	1/25/1998 3:48:00 PM
From: hpeace	Respond to of 97611

I remember when one of the Kenndy's was accused of rape a number of yrs ago. one of the kids. they were interviewing an 80 yr old women on the court channel to see if she could be a jurer. They ask her what she thought of the Kennedys?? this is almost a quote of what one of here responses was. she kept the nation in a riot laughter for minutes. She said " the Kennedies were very bright people.. really smart and gifted, but when they drank then all their brains ran to their peter and they ended up in trouble with women<gggg>!!!!!!!! anyway, she gave a great 5-10 minutes of riot laughter with her candor and the fact that she was 80+ made it more of a riot.

To: gc who wrote (14829)	1/25/1998 4:03:00 PM
From: ed	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 97611

What is your high moral standard ? Why do you think I am wrong and seriously wrong while you are right and absolutely right ? What do you think about JK? Is he a good president or bad one thinking of his morality? How about IRK ? A man has couple of girl friends does not mean he could not be a president, and it does not mean a president has couple of girl friends can not continue being a good president. You are now talking two different things. Maybe next time we need to elect a priest to be our president.Oh no, priest also has sex with his worshippers. The reason Bush lost the election is because he concentrated on different issues which had nothing to do with the presideny.Talking about presidency, we are talking about performance, capability, new vision ...etc. You should talk about morality in the church !!! We has seen in history those with perfect morality but performed lously in the presidency, so, morality did not guarantee a perfect president, and a good president does not necessary need perfect morality, especially something related to his private life. As long as he performed, and do a good job on this position, the what you call morality is something Clinton should resolve privately with his wife. I think the president has every right (privacy) as every citizen in this country. Do you like you sex life being talked publicly on the medias? I do not think so. I do not think Clinton force those ladies to have S_X if there is really one, so it should be counted as voluntary. So, who had morality problem is very clear. Those who take advantage of this (interfere people's private life) scandal for personal (political or money) are really ones had moral problems. If you want to talk morality , you should point to those people !!!!!