Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Osicom(FIBR) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Eddy Blinker who wrote (4801)	1/25/1998 3:17:00 PM
From: Mama Bear	Respond to of 10479

>>>Now I go for a few beers<<< Umm, don't you think you've already had too many? Barb

To: Eddy Blinker who wrote (4801)	1/25/1998 5:26:00 PM
From: ted birnbaum	Respond to of 10479

And if you do not agree your just an idiot. Ok now I see.

To: Eddy Blinker who wrote (4801)	1/25/1998 6:15:00 PM
From: CMS27	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 10479

Eddy, Craig Crawford cannot do anything to appreciably effect the price of FIBR by what he posts on these threads. The volume traded lately was well beyond the means of this and the yahoo thread, no offense to any big wheels, but we saw institutional activity here recently. Craig can raise doubt in the minds of those long the stock, who don't have a clear understanding of the risks. If you DO understand the risks, then Craigs posts are no more than noise. I need him to tell me that a small conglomeration of small business's challenging on the turf of the likes of Cisco, Lucent and 3COM is risky? Please, enough already. The basic principle here is this. An investment in one of these giants has a lower downside and a lower upside. Osicom has a downside down to flat broke and out of business and an upside all the way to becoming a Cisco. It's called risk/reward. You play the game by not putting all your eggs into the risky basket, but enough that it will mean something should they take off. Noone investing in FIBR should be unprepared to lose it all. Now if you pass the test of this statement, what difference does Craigs opinion make? I really need to stop reading this thread for a while and Eddy I strongly urge you to do the same. Also, let it calm you by saying that Osicom does read this thread and their lawyers are prepared for anything that is said that is slanderous or liabelous. If you doubt that ask Craig, he's had a nice long chat with Osi's lawyers in the past. Scott