Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: IC720 who wrote (1202366)	2/18/2020 3:47:09 PM
From: Wharf Rat	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1577842

"Heller has 45yrs exp, Easterbrook in vid with 50yrs." That's 95 years of being wrong about AGW. "Both have proven tampering." They're both lying. "The same people who get their science from a 17 year old who doesn't attend school, tell me that my 45 years in science and engineering doesn't qualify me to discuss science." (Heller) She gets her science from scientists, and those people are right; you aren't qualified to discuss climate science. Graph by @CarbonBrief. And please note this is for a 67% chance of staying below 1,5°C of average temp rise, and does not include the global aspect of equity, most feedback loops, non-linear tipping points nor additional warming hidden by air pollution. 2/2 — Greta Thunberg (@GretaThunberg) February 18, 2020 Last month, we hit 1.5 degrees, so we've prolly already used up the entire budget. Further, last month was the warmest January on record in the @NASAGISS (GISTEMPv4) data set. It was approximately 1.50°C above pre-industrial level. + Summary taken from https://t.co/BK76nkHlLf + Additional graphs: https://t.co/cCn2ztYpHF + Data: https://t.co/8pB26Jttrh pic.twitter.com/SenQt9mani — Zack Labe (@ZLabe) February 14, 2020