Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : AMD, ARMH, INTC, NVDA -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Vattila who wrote (35317)	2/22/2020 2:56:25 AM
From: Vattila	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 73044

This slide also states 6T, so it is very unlikely to be a mistake. If AMD had known where Intel would be now, with all their 10nm process problems, perhaps AMD would have selected N7 HP (7.5T) instead, and thoroughly surpassed Skylake/CFL on the desktop in single-thread performance, while still have been far more power-efficient than Intel's current 14nm Xeon in the server segment. But presumably they had to plan and prepare for a functional 10nm process from Intel, which on paper at least, has great density and power metrics.