Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Rocky Mountain Int'l (OTC:RMIL former OTC:OVIS) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TLWatson59 who wrote (38108)	1/25/1998 7:21:00 PM
From: TideGlider	Respond to of 55532

TL: Very well stated. DD does not mean "D"ial "D" company. TG

To: TLWatson59 who wrote (38108)	1/25/1998 7:55:00 PM
From: MY OPINION	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 55532

TLW, I respect your reason's and right to post. I just thought a man with your obvious breeding and intelect,would be able to say these things without resorting to name calling. Guess i was wrong. Regards and the best to you DADDY

To: TLWatson59 who wrote (38108)	1/25/1998 8:13:00 PM
From: s martin	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 55532

I just want to say I appreciate your posts and think with "your intellect and breeding" you do THE finest job of cutting to the chase of anyone here, bar none. I hope the bullies won't be able to run you off as they did MK. It is a disservice to all when opposing viewpoints cannot be expressed. But then we know that scams cannot survive when put to the test. Thank you.

To: TLWatson59 who wrote (38108)	1/25/1998 10:21:00 PM
From: joseph krinsky	Respond to of 55532

TL Watson, you must be having a bad, chill out. wait and see, your having a cow, cool it, of coursr smartin would agree with you ; you have been told the truth take it like a man. maybe you had all your money on green bay to bad, for the cheese heads, and mk. joey

To: TLWatson59 who wrote (38108)	1/25/1998 11:22:00 PM
From: Pugs	Respond to of 55532

Now that you've given us your thesis, you better re-work the 'body' of the text, it doesn't hold water. 1) An observation is not an attack...when you call me names or question my ability to think because of "too many blows to the head", it is no reflection on me, you do yourself a dis-service, I have never, and will never resort to that with you. Name-calling is always the 'last resort' 2)>>>>2. I do not appreciate being berated by anyone on this thread because I choose the respond courteously to a personal request. That includes responding to "brokers" who dimwits charge are in violation of rules yet have apparently received no censure of any kind despite repeated attacks by these individuals for any kind of violation<<<<< I never berated you, I said you were 'not' "objective"....you never commented on a broker who slams the stock 8-10hrs. a day, a broker with a pathological compulsion to tank this stock. Your silence was a 'indicator', it indicates that you echo his sentiment and are not "objective". The rest of your points deal with perspective...the 10 day halt is over, expand on that how you wish, the co. will provide the 10K to the MM's upon reciept of the monies...make of that what you want, paint that disasterous if you wish....but the MM's are short and won't cover, they'll make the Market....All of your joint efforts have been unable to dig-up who the investor is or why the money is late...keep guessing, when others know...and wonder why your desperate attempts aren't applauded.....or why RMCW really needs the cash to finish the new facilities in time to fill its' backorders...paint that anyway you want, who cares? Just realize that we're aware there is no 'objectivity' in your analysis....and don't be surprised when we tell you we find that suspect. Pugs