Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Cross Lake Minerals CRN -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: the Chief who wrote (1358)	1/25/1998 7:14:00 PM
From: the Chief	Respond to of 3650

To further explain this. If there is heavy concentration of copper for a complete drill core from 0 to 1000 feet and adjacent drill hole core "say 2000 feet away" has the same concentration. If you insert a cathode in one core and an anode in the other and apply an electrical current and get conductivity, what have you established? What you have established is that there is a conductive path between the two cores. But because electricity "always" takes the path of lessor resistance it only proves conductivity. What you may have done is passed the current into the side wall of one core, had the current run up the side wall to the surface and crossed to the other core. No matter where you place the anode and cathode it will always take the path of lessor resistance so varying it up or down the core won't make any difference. Producing the "sheet of paper" thickness I described. What would be interesting is if they employed an Electromagnetic pulse(EMP), if so this "could" produce a three dimensional signature and "light up the ground" as you have described. the Chief