Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TobagoJack who wrote (153503)	2/23/2020 9:09:06 AM
From: SirWalterRalegh	Respond to of 218863

But if below (i got in e-mail) true, then not-good, or un-good, or bad, as in forget about the stock market This calculation is flawed. Most likely the 52% rate would be applied to any earnings over $29K. Either way BS would be disaster to the US economy and equity markets.

To: TobagoJack who wrote (153503)	2/23/2020 10:59:09 AM
From: marcher	1 Recommendation Recommended By ggersh Respond to of 218863

--same possible reasons Trump’s victory might be explained, that there is much anger-- and there is much dispossession. piketty and saez (origin of 99% vs 1%): eml.berkeley.edu gilens and page 'princeton' study (u.s. rule by oligarchy): scholar.princeton.edu confirmation bias makes things difficult to see... for all of us.

To: TobagoJack who wrote (153503)	2/23/2020 2:28:09 PM
From: Maurice Winn	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 218863

Easy to fix. Just double the minimum pay to $30 per hour then hey presto everyone gets free medical insurance. Might as well make it $60 per hour so everyone can gave free cash flow to go shopping to stimulate the economy and create more jobs for a billion illegals. Economics is easy. Mqurice

To: TobagoJack who wrote (153503)	2/23/2020 2:58:24 PM
From: marcher	1 Recommendation Recommended By ggersh Respond to of 218863

--fake news, then also ungood as indication of social tension-- yep. "...But Sanders didn’t call for a 52% income tax rate for those making $29,000 at the debate, the transcript shows, or elsewhere that we could find... In one document posted by Sanders, he suggested a potential marginal tax rate of 52% on income above $10 million — meaning taxable income earned after the first $10 million would be taxed at that rate..." factcheck.org