Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Canadian Diamond Play Cafi -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: MadDogMike who wrote (16011)	2/24/2020 8:44:03 PM
From: Natedog	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 16203

Thanks for that. Old faithful of the area. 60 and 61 on a line that connects them. 64, 50, and 25 diamonds. Odds down there say more diamond bearing them above. Not looking to crisp on my napkin once they find 1 micro and it tanks. :) Let's see what the sample says in hind sight.

To: MadDogMike who wrote (16011)	2/26/2020 11:39:33 AM
From: MadDogMike	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 16203

Those KON2 and KON3 anomalies just came back as not kimberlite. Statistically tough industry. Now i have my doubts on those 4 anomalies to the west. I think I will just watch and see instead of ponying up some coin for PGP. Drill hole KON-20-04 has tested the KON 2 magnetic high target, intersecting Magnetite-rich gabbroic intrusive from 73 meters to 103 meters. KON-20-05 tested the KON 3 magnetic low target intersecting a silicified mafic volcanic sequence containing mafic, pyritized porphyry bodies from 11 meters to 208 meters. The magnetic low feature is interpreted to be a window of steeply dipping Archean volcano-stratigraphy emergent in the Huronian Cobalt embayment. Selective sampling intervals from both holes totalling 83 meters have been submitted for gold fire assay and ICP multi-element analysis. Trying to deflect the market by testing for other elements within the non-kimberlite drillholes. Has that worked for anyone, ever? EKIM