Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Westell WSTL -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Dug who wrote (9157)	1/25/1998 9:25:00 PM
From: Dug	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 21342

[Just another quick thought] techstocks.com Bookmark the above site w/ Netscape 3.0 & its say microsfot. Just a tidbit. For anyone who wants a prelude to this weeks events. Find the Cisco, Wstl, Ala, whitepaper fromn earlier this year. It should tell you something. Regards, Dug

To: Dug who wrote (9157)	1/25/1998 11:01:00 PM
From: Chemsync	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 21342

<<Dosen't this seem strange to anyone beside me?>> Hi Dug, Augmentation seems to be a secure move. Westell augmented--though conversely to Efficient. If a developer doesn't know what the ruling will be he can buy or develop the rival technology and be assured of survival into the next round. No one wants to be outside the standards. Their dead if they are. Lets remember, the current standard is DMT. CAP is seeking to be added. The only way to lose, as I see, is to have ONLY CAP and have CAP excluded from the new standard. If CAP is excluded it makes it difficult for Westell-but they'll survive--now. Of course, if CAP augments the current standards then that's a bonus for WSTL. Have I got my ducks lined up right? sg