Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Did Slick Boink Monica? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Surething who wrote (1353)	1/26/1998 6:20:00 AM
From: Dwight E. Karlsen	Respond to of 20981

that's why I said allegedly. Re >And I thought Starr was the Whitewater investigator. Why is he mixed up in any of this?< Obviously Janet Reno has appointed him to investigate these new possible violations of the law. There may be links to Whitewater in the tapes, we don't know. But obviously Janet Reno appointed him to do it. Why she didn't pick someone else, I have no idear. re >And on whose authority does Starr have the right to ask anybody whether they had an affair with the President.< I'm not Starr or Reno, so I can't speak for them. But obviously they aren't asking her directly whether she had an affair with the Pres!!! Nobody except the Paula Jones' legal team has asked her that, and the judge in that case allowed it as part of the sexual harassment trial. You'll have to ask that judge why that was allowed...but it was something to do with showing patterns of past behavior I think. What Starr is asking Lewinsky is.......does she want to change her sworn affidavit, in view of contradictory things said on the tape....if she declines to change her sworn affidavit, then he prosecutes for perjury, and she goes to the big house.......seems simple enough to me..