Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : View from the Center and Left -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: JohnM who wrote (432239)	3/6/2020 5:22:48 PM
From: koan	1 Recommendation Recommended By Maple MAGA Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 540758

I know you have a PHD and are learned. Which why it surprises me you would split hairs about social science being a science. I don't think social science needs to have the same certainly as natural science to be called science. If it produces meaningful information better than randomness or myths, calling it a science is fine with me. If one just has probability, that tells us a lot. So is probability good enough to be called a science?. In my book it is. Any information better than randomness or gut instincts furthers the quest for a more humanitarian society, IMO.