Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Rocky Mountain Int'l (OTC:RMIL former OTC:OVIS) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Pugs who wrote (38212)	1/26/1998 12:23:00 PM
From: I Am John Galt	Respond to of 55532

Pugs, messing with the credibility of tonto is a fight you will not win. Fight the fights you have a chance winning. You're willing to bash everyone and everything. Tonto is a good man. He doesn't have to answer for any action that has to do outside of here. He's done a heluva lot for the ARET and NETZ thread, so he's not here for RMIL kicks. And there will be about thirty people telling you to quiet down if you attempt to mess with his credibility. Boy, are you getting desperate. My favorite part with your reasoning is that you feel tonto's history is "relevant", and RMIL management's history is not. Matty Gregg

To: Pugs who wrote (38212)	1/26/1998 12:30:00 PM
From: tonto	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 55532

Pugs, you are confused about the truth about GIFS or what actually took place. Do not expect me to row your boat regarding GIFS. Try as hard as you like, twist the information as hard as you can, but it will lead you nowhere. RMIL on the other hand is entirely a different issue. Our discussion only highlights in writing what RMIL is to date. It is a company that operates out of only one leased factory, that being the one in the Dominican Republic. As you are aware, they were evicted in Nicaragua and no longer are in business there, and the leased factory in Hialeah is subleased to another firm. They have lost considerable capacity during another tough year for the company. The company should have released this very materially important information to the investing public, as until it was disclosed here, most investors believed as late as a couple months ago that their company owned their own factories, instead of having been evicted from a leased factory. I know you support how current management operates, but it is better for investors to know that the company had changed dramatically and never owned the factories that they leased. From the brochure: Olympus Ventures, Inc. of Ft. Lauderdale, Florida, a well managed, well financed company, has taken advantage of this major opportunity. Over the past 18 months, Olympus has purchased several high quality garment factories and in doing so has created a vertically integrated apparel manufacturing operation easily capable of fulfilling full packaging contracts. Now with some of the best-known names in the retail garment industry already on its customer list, and with sales in calender 1997 expected to top $12 million, Olympus appears to be well prepared for long term growth.