SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: locogringo who wrote (1209734)3/16/2020 2:15:44 PM
From: Tenchusatsu2 Recommendations

Recommended By
Brumar89
Wharf Rat

  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1578289
 
Locogringo, that article is garbage. It argues that the death rate of coronavirus is actually lower than what's reported because it assumes that the number of people actually infected by the coronavirus is much higher than the number of people who have been tested and confirmed to have it.

Look at countries like South Korea. They have a very aggressive testing program. Chances are that the number of confirmed cases of coronavirus is close to the actual number of people infected.

Compare that with Italy. The fatality rate of coronavirus is already pretty damned high. Confirmed cases continue to rise at an astronomical rate. When all is said and done, the death rate in Italy might go down a bit as the number of confirmed cases gets closer to the actual number of infections, but there's no denying that Italians are already dying at a significant pace.

Bottom line is that the article jumps to conclusions based on a really bad assumption. All to push a dangerous narrative, that coronavirus is no more fatal than seasonal flu. That's anti-vax logic.

Tenchusatsu