To: rd greer who wrote (25879 ) 1/26/1998 2:56:00 PM From: elk Read Replies (1) | Respond to
rd, 3 for 3 heck of a batting average.<GGG> But I look at three for three this way. He's been wrong with his facts, his assumptions and his information. So you can see how mowing lawns and trimming hedges could hold appeal for someone who has such limited resources, when it comes to investing. He bought stock from a con at 18, well with that kind of start, I would learn to research and investigate companies properly before investing again. I guess that we are unfortunate not to have lost or made money from cons, like the dancing man. He admits to having lost money a few times on 'scams' and to have profitted from at least one. His defense in the DNA matter was that he received a tip and was correct with his information, so therefore not culpable for any wrong doing. Of course, that sounds like Unjustifiable enrichment to me a favorite topic for him. I guess he does not hold himself to the standards that he holds others. Just another contradiction between what he postures himself as and what he truly is.
