SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: TobagoJack who wrote (154797)3/20/2020 6:04:53 AM
From: TobagoJack  Respond to of 217572
 
Getting back to work, China first, everywhere next

bloomberg.com

Tech Industry Gauge Signals China Rebound in March, Nomura Says



Employees work on a mobile phone assembly line in China. Photographer: Qilai Shen/Bloomberg Sign up for Next China, a weekly email on where the nation stands now and where it's going next.

A gauge of growth momentum in China’s high-tech industries rebounded significantly in March after falling to a record low in the previous month, indicating that part of the Chinese economy is gradually returning to work.

The Emerging Industries Purchasing Managers’ index rose to 55.3 percentage points this month from 29.9 in February, according to Nomura International HK Ltd, citing a research firm connected to the Federation of Logistics & Purchasing that compiled the data.

While the reading is still below the month’s average in past five years, it could signal a jump in the official PMI to 57 from 35.7 in February, Chief China Economist Lu Ting in Hong Kong wrote in a report to clients. If that’s the case, it’d be the highest reading since 2008 and signal that a rebound from the crushing shutdowns to curb the coronavirus is under way.

China Emerging Industries Gauge Slumps to Record Low on Virus

China is to release its official manufacturing gauge on March 31st.

Still, any improvement in the manufacturing gauge would says more about sentiment recovery from the extremely low base in the previous month, rather than a solid rebound on the year. With the likelihood of a global recession rising, the Chinese economy will continue to face challenges ahead, from falling demand to deflation.

“We expect more policy easing in coming months, while the likelihood of another round of massive stimulus appears low as policy space remains limited,” Lu said.

— With assistance by Yinan Zhao



To: TobagoJack who wrote (154797)3/20/2020 6:08:36 AM
From: TobagoJack1 Recommendation

Recommended By
marcher

  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 217572
 
Nice, for the people by the people against other people but always ahead of all people

Now they get to buy in full confidence, undamaged, and give selves a bonus for saving the people

bloomberg.com

U.S. Senators Sold Stock After Coronavirus Briefings in January
David KocieniewskiMarch 20, 2020, 9:16 AM GMT+2



The U.S. Capitol Rotunda in Washington.

Photographer: Alex Wroblewski/BloombergWe’re tracking the latest on the coronavirus outbreak and the global response. Sign up here for our daily newsletter on what you need to know.

Four U.S. senators sold stock after receiving sensitive briefings in late January about the emerging threat of the coronavirus, sparking concerns that they put safeguarding their private finances before their duty to protect public health.

Senator Richard Burr, a Republican from North Carolina, and Kelly Loeffler, a Republican from Georgia, both completed their sales at a time when the Trump administration and GOP leaders were downplaying the potential damage the virus might cause in the U.S. and before drastic stock-market plunges set off by the pandemic.

Burr is chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee, which receives frequent briefings about threats facing the country, and has experience responding to public-health crises. Loeffler – who was appointed to her seat in December after Senator Johnny Isakson announced that he was resigning because of health problems – is married to the chairman of the New York Stock Exchange,
Jeffrey Sprecher.

Two other members of the Intelligence Committee, Senator Dianne Feinstein, a Democrat from California, and Senator James Inhofe, an Oklahoma Republican, also sold stock after the briefings, according to financial records.



Loeffler did not make any sales from Jan. 6 until Jan. 24 -- the day the health committee she sits on held a briefing that included presentations from top level U.S. public-health officials including Dr. Anthony Fauci.

She and her husband began selling 27 stocks on Jan. 24, according to her financial disclosure form, including investments in Auto Zone and Ross Stores, worth millions of dollars. Loeffler’s stock sales were first reported by the Daily Beast.

‘Baseless Attack’Loeffler responded on Twitter by calling criticism of her stock sales “a ridiculous and baseless attack.” The tweet said “I do not make investment decisions for my portfolio. Investment decisions are made by multiple third-party advisors without my or my husband’s knowledge or involvement.”

Burr sold 33 stocks on Feb. 13, according to his financial disclosure form, with a total value between $628,00 and $1.7 million. His stock sales were first reported by ProPublica. Three of the assets he sold were in hotel companies, which have seen their value plummet as the coronavirus threat has drastically curtailed travel.

His office said that his sales were unrelated to any information he received by virtue of his position as intelligence committee chairman.

“Senator Burr filed a financial disclosure form for personal transactions made several weeks before the U.S. and financial markets showed signs of volatility due to the growing coronavirus outbreak,” a Burr spokesperson said in a statement. “As the situation continues to evolve daily, he has been deeply concerned by the steep and sudden toll this pandemic is taking on our economy.”

Economy ReelingWith the virus now spreading, its death toll rising and the global economy reeling, news of the stock sales brought angry calls for Burr to resign.

“As Intel chairman,” Burr “got private briefings about coronavirus weeks ago,” Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez of New York tweeted. “Burr knew how bad it would be. He told the truth to his wealthy donors while assuring the public that we were fine.”

“THEN he sold off $1.6 million in stock before the fall. He needs to resign,” she added. According to NPR, Burr told a private group in late February that the virus could present a greater economic danger than had been publicly discussed.

Fox News host Tucker Carlson also called for Burr’s resignation.

Feinstein made transactions on Jan. 31 and Feb. 18, selling between $1.5 million and $6 million worth of shares in Allogene Therapeutics, a biotech company. Inhofe sold $400,000 worth of stock on Jan. 27, including PayPaland the real estate company Brookfield Asset Management.

Before it's here, it's on the Bloomberg Terminal.
LEARN MORE

Sent from my iPad



To: TobagoJack who wrote (154797)3/20/2020 6:37:10 AM
From: TobagoJack1 Recommendation

Recommended By
sense

  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 217572
 
The boyz play well together until someone gets hurt
Let’s see who does what to whom, how and when

bloomberg.com

Putin Won’t Submit to What Is Seen as Saudi Oil-Price Blackmail

Ilya Arkhipov

Russian President Vladimir Putin will refuse to submit to what the Kremlin sees as oil blackmail from Saudi Arabia, signaling the price war that’s roiling global energy markets will continue.

The unprecedented clash between the two giant exporters -- and former OPEC+ allies -- threatens to push the price of a barrel below $20, but the Kremlin won’t be the first to blink and seek a truce, said people familiar with the government’s position.



Photographer: Andrey Rudakov/Bloomberg

Putin’s government has spent years building reserves for this kind of crisis. While Russia didn’t expect the Saudis to trigger a price war, the people said, the Kremlin so far is confident that it can hold out longer than Riyadh.



“Putin is known for not submitting to pressure,” said Alexander Dynkin, president of the Institute of World Economy and International Relations in Moscow, a state-run think tank that advises government on foreign policy and economy. He has proved that he is ready for a hard competition “to protect national interests and to keep his political image as a strongman.”

After two decades at Russia’s helm, the president has enough experience to survive the current crisis, said three people, asking not to be named because the information isn’t public. Putin is not someone who gives in, even if the fight brings significant losses, said one person.

The ArchitectThe entire oil market is watching and waiting to see if Russia or Saudi Arabia will balk at the painful price slump and call a truce. Brent crude has plunged from over $50 a barrel in early March to as low as $24.52 this week as the Gulf kingdom, angered by the Kremlin’s veto of deeper OPEC+ cuts, undertook a historic output surge just as the coronavirus pandemic wiped out demand.

The losses are already visible for Russia, weakening its currency and potentially putting the nation on course for a recession. The state budget, which is based on oil prices of just above $40 per barrel, will be in deficit this year, forcing the government to tap its sovereign-wealth fund just two months after Putin promised higher social spending.



Donald Trump on March 19.

Photographer: Evan Vucci/AP Photo/Bloomberg

U.S. President Donald Trump Thursday called the price war “devastating to Russia” and said, “at the appropriate time, I’ll get involved.” The Wall Street Journal reported the White House is considering new sanctions against Russia as a means to push for higher prices. So far, the Kremlin has refused to change policies in the face of such restrictions from the Trump administration.

“Someone’s economy always suffers from low or high oil prices,” Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said. “Now many companies are suffering, including shale-oil producers in the U.S.”

Russia is always ready to talk, “especially in such dramatic times,” he said. Earlier in the week, Peskov said Russia would like to see oil prices higher. Crude prices jumped after Trump’s comments.

Russia and Saudi Arabia were architects of the original cooperation deal between the Organization of Petroleum Exporting countries and several other non-members in 2016. Their goal was to end a slump in prices as low as $27 a barrel and initially their accord was a great success.

The PrinceCrude rebounded and relations between the two nations and their leadership were very warm. But over time, the alliance became increasingly unbalanced as the Saudis took an greater share of output curbs and Russia flouted its obligations.



Vladimir Putin, right, shakes hands with Mohammed bin Salman on the sidelines of the G20 Summit in Osaka in 2019.

Photographer: Yuri Kadobnov/AFP via Getty Images

Putin engaged in obvious power plays, making the OPEC+ meeting in June 2019 essentially redundant by pre-announcing fresh cuts after a chat with Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman in Osaka, Japan.

Russian decisions came to carry ever-greater weight within OPEC+, eventually leading to a rupture early this month. Saudi Energy Minster Abdulaziz bin Salman, the Crown Prince’s older brother, demanded additional cuts to offset the impact of the coronavirus, but his counterpart from Moscow, Alexander Novak, said no.

Saudi Arabia responded with a shock-and-awe oil price war that stunned the global oil industry. Riyadh’s unprecedented barrage on the crude market included the deepest price cut in 20 years, a record supply surge and a fleet of tankers to deliver it, and tens of billions of dollars for new fields.

If these shock-and awe tactics were designed to bend Putin to the kingdom’s will, so far they haven’t succeeded.

The StrongmanThe Russian president has made refusing to back down under pressure one of the hallmarks of his rule. From the brutal crackdown on Islamist terrorists in Chechnya to the recent showdown with Turkey over the civil war in Syria, Putin has shown he’s willing to face down foes in the face of both military and economic pressure.

In 2014, when waves of western sanctions over Putin’s annexation of Crimea in Ukraine battered Russia’s economy and some of his closest associates, he refused to consider calls from some of his allies to soften his line. Earlier this year, Rosneft PJSC, run by the president’s close ally Igor Sechin, shrugged off U.S. sanctions on its trade in Venezuelan crude.

Putin’s team expected the collapse of OPEC+ talks to lead to a price decline, two of the people said. The Russian leadership was ready for crude plunging as low as $20 and is facing the economic consequences with a cool head, one person said.

Still, with the national economy bleeding, “Russia has enough pragmatism and common sense not to refuse talks,” with its OPEC partners, Dynkin said.

The Kremlin is still open to cooperation with OPEC, but on its own conditions. The Russian proposal -- rejected by the Saudis -- for OPEC+ to maintain its existing production cuts until the end of June still stands, two of the people said.

For any discussion with the Gulf kingdom to restart, both Russia and Saudi Arabia will need to make some face-saving steps requiring “a complicated PR dance,” said Elina Ribakova, U.S.-based deputy chief economist at the Institute of International Finance.

Russia’s current position is unlikely to achieve that.

“It is unlikely that Saudi Arabia now would turn around and agree to the Russian proposal of extending the current cuts,” said Dmitry Marinchenko, senior director at Fitch Ratings Ltd. “That would essentially mean they have given in to Russia and lost face.”

— With assistance by Irina Reznik, and Gregory White

Sent from my iPad



To: TobagoJack who wrote (154797)3/20/2020 6:45:25 AM
From: TobagoJack  Respond to of 217572
 
I rarely agree w/ this Shuli Ren fellow and this time no an exception, however it is useful to reflect on what such think before we hunt them for sport

bloomberg.com

If Ray Dalio Isn't Making Money Now, Neither Will You

The coronavirus is upending traditional relationships between asset classes. Even the smartest money is failing the test.

Shuli RenMarch 20, 2020, 6:11 AM GMT+2



Bridgewater’s All Weather strategy could use an umbrella.

Photographer: Patrick T. Fallon/Bloomberg

LISTEN TO ARTICLE
The coronavirus outbreak is costing hedge funds billions, as a massive dislocation across asset classes causes a breakdown in traditional relationships.

In the past 10 days, bonds, stocks and even gold — a hedge against the prospect of central banks’ helicopter money — are falling in tandem. Funds that rely on computer algorithms and historical global macro trends are hurting.

Take the risk parity trade, made popular by Bridgewater Associates LP. Such strategies bet on a near-perfect match between stock rallies and bond sell-offs — and it has worked out very well for the past decade. As of early March, the weekly correlation between the S&P 500 and 10-year Treasury bonds was minus 0.84, the lowest since early 2015, Goldman Sachs Group Inc. estimates. A score of minus 1 would mean there is perfect negative correlation — that is, when stocks rise, bonds would always fall.

But the coronavirus shook that landscape. The yield on 10-year Treasuries has doubled in recent days, from 0.54% on March 9 to 1.14% Thursday, even as the Federal Reserve slashed its benchmark rate to zero. We’re seeing the same thing in Japan. Stocks and bonds are falling, dragging the underlying thesis of the risk parity trade down with it.

To make matters worse, these trades tend to use leverage to amplify bond exposure, because stocks have historically been more volatile. Risk parity — as the name implies — seeks to equalize a portfolio’s risk exposure in both asset classes. And boy, whoever said bonds are stable hadn't seen anything like the coronavirus. Take a look at the ICE BoA MOVE Index — the bond-market equivalent to the Chicago Board Exchange Volatility Index, or VIX — which is at its most volatile since 2009. It turns out even U.S. government bonds aren’t that safe.

Or consider those statistical arbitrage funds that use computer algorithms to scour markets for tiny mispricings. These funds rely heavily on leverage to juice gains. But dollar funding is freezing up as banks hunker down for corporate clients and add to reserves to buffer against market volatility, margin calls and flash crashes. If a fund was only making, say, 10 basis points on illiquid trades, and its broker is now raising lending rates to pare back counterparty risk, it now faces the uncomfortable question of whether to liquidate its position.

And forget about relative value trades, which seek to find arbitrage opportunities in mispriced pairs of highly correlated assets. In the currency world, this has unraveled as investors rush to the haven of the U.S. dollar. A sharp weakening of the Australian dollar this month, for instance, might seem overdone, as it tends to follow the Chinese yuan, which has been eerily stable lately. But as Societe Generale SA's currency strategist Kit Juckes wrote, the current market makes a mockery of overthinking trade ideas.

Industry titans are getting caught wrong-footed. Bridgewater’s All Weather fund, which pioneered the risk parity trade, is down 12% so far this year. Meanwhile, Izzy Englander’s Millennium Management has closed more than 10 of its “trading pods.” Millennium relies heavily on relative value trades.

And these are the pros, who have been through the Long-Term Capital Management bailout in 1998 and the Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. bankruptcy a decade later. For those too young to remember such violent market dislocations, the bloodbath has probably been even worse. Considering the benchmark S&P Risk Parity Index already tumbled 16.5% this year, Bridgewater’s All Weather fund isn’t even doing that badly.

Global markets managed to breathe a little Thursday as major central banks took out the big guns. The Federal Reserve revived a few emergency lending facilities put to sleep after the global financial crisis, and established currency swap lines with emerging markets such as Brazil and Mexico. But is it enough? We have all agreed central banks can’t stop the virus; at best, they can only blunt the blow to financial markets.

Ray Dalio, Bridgewater’s founder, famously said that cash is trash. Now, Dalio, who is revered in China, has to get associates there to dispel rumors that his funds have “crashed.” As we’ve argued, the coronavirus is turning all of us — people and companies — into hoarders. All we want is cash. The hedge funds that borrowed piles of the stuff to buy everything around the world can't be feeling too comfortable about the weeks ahead.

This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of Bloomberg LP and its owners.

To contact the author of this story:
Shuli Ren at sren38@bloomberg.net

To contact the editor responsible for this story:
Rachel Rosenthal at rrosenthal21@bloomberg.net



To: TobagoJack who wrote (154797)3/20/2020 6:55:37 AM
From: Secret_Agent_Man  Respond to of 217572
 
exactly!
The selling has not been sincere. The sincerity shall come,
Indeed



To: TobagoJack who wrote (154797)3/20/2020 1:09:22 PM
From: Lazarus1 Recommendation

Recommended By
Snowshoe

  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 217572
 
RE: ,for the ferocious-relief slingshot to-da-moon.

A bounce is definitely in order -- but everyone anticipating it.

I note that many boomers are holding tight positions because in the past "the market has always bounced back"

What if not a V recovery and moon shoot. What if sideways until all puke?

Also, how to price in this from the 5th largest economy in the world:

California governor Gavin Newsom issues statewide 'Stay At Home' order for 40 million people with NO END DATE -

(which is ambiguous as many dont know whether it means they should work or not -- and if so how and when)



To: TobagoJack who wrote (154797)3/20/2020 3:03:26 PM
From: Lazarus  Respond to of 217572
 
Additionally -- to keep it in perspective --- if this is a bear market we have lost point wise in 4 weeks what took 17 months in 2007 - 2009.

Let's see where we're at in 17 months.

Percentage wise -- we would have a LOT FARTHER DOWN TO GO

Also, I noted a lot of Twitter folks all bulled up for today.

Oh, and there's the wooly one who's still saying "watch the sky" (as per usual)