Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Let's Talk About Our Feelings!!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: epicure who wrote (17073)	1/26/1998 3:13:00 PM
From: jim kelley	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 108807

Alexa, I did not mean to get you so upset and emotional. You get really nasty when you are that way. Like I said earlier idealists are more brutal than realists/pragmatists. You too want him convicted badly and you do not have a shred of evidence or a legal foot to stand on. Face it! You have a animus toward Clinton.

To: epicure who wrote (17073)	1/26/1998 6:43:00 PM
From: T.R.	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 108807

<<the LYING UNDER OATH AND SUBORNING PERJURY AND OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE>> alexa, If what I've heard and read is accurate (in the news) what you say is absolutely correct. Clinton denied any affairs with Ms. Flowers because he knew he could not get elected if he "did the right thing." Now, after he has become a lame duck President (I'll resist the obvious temptation to take a cheap shot here) he has no problem admitting it in his deposition to the Paula Jones team. While watching "bits and pieces" of TIME and AGAIN last night I heard a tape recorded message from Mr. Bill coaching the other person not to admit to anyone that they had spoke to him. I believe it was under the guise that it could hurt THEIR opportunity at a position. I think the tape was fairly old (several years) it may even have dated back to when he was Governor. If he does "dodge a bullet" on this latest round, even I will be impressed. Starr seems to have an "ace" up his sleeve..otherwise I don't understand why he would be taking such a hard line with Ms. Lewinsky (sp?) Did her family contribute a sizeable sum toward his first campaign for president? Just curious if anyone knows. One other thing that doesn't seem to be accepted by his supporters on the various threads is the Republican party is not out there "taking shots at him." Whoa..it's getting late.. Talk to you later, T.R.