SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Items affecting stock market picks -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Cogito Ergo Sum who wrote (6016)3/21/2020 2:38:31 PM
From: russet  Respond to of 8282
 
medscape.org

Note: This is the seventh of a series of clinical briefs on the coronavirus outbreak. The information on this subject is continually evolving. The content within this activity serves as a historical reference to the information that was available at the time of this publication. We continue to add to the collection of activities on this subject as new information becomes available.

Clinical ContextThe world continues to respond to the recent outbreak of respiratory disease caused by a novel coronavirus that was first detected in Wuhan City, Hubei Province, China. Novel coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) spread rapidly from Wuhan City to all of mainland China in approximately 1 month. Rapid growth there has apparently slowed, but outbreaks have since occurred in South Korea, Japan, Iran, and Italy, as well as small numbers of cases appearing in many other countries. Although the World Health Organization (WHO) has not yet deemed the outbreak a pandemic, it emphasized that this could change at any time, and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has warned that it is only a matter of time before COVID-19 occurs throughout US communities, mandating preparation and implementation of prevention and containment strategies by schools, businesses, and organizations.

In a recent press conference, after the first reported US death in Washington State on Feb. 29, Anthony S. Fauci, MD, director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, indicated 75% - 80% of patients infected with COVID-19 will have mild illness and recover according to the current pattern of disease, while 15%-20% will require advanced medical care. He stated that, the more serious cases would likely occur in those who are elderly or have underlying medical conditions.

Currently, COVID-19 appears to be highly infectious, but only a small percentage of cases develop severe illness, and the case fatality rate (CFR) overall appears to be less than 3%. It is therefore important to identify characteristics of those most vulnerable to complications and death as a way of combating the virus. The largest case series to date of COVID-19 was recently published by the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, including >72,314 cases in mainland China as of February 11, 2020. A viewpoint published in JAMA summarizes the main findings and highlights emerging understanding of and lessons from the COVID-19 epidemic.

Study Synopsis and PerspectiveAs of March 1st, COVID-19 has infected 87,137 people and has caused almost 2977 deaths worldwide according to the WHO.

Although the vast majority of these infections and deaths have been in China, there are now pockets of infection in Iran, Italy, Japan, and South Korea, as well as handfuls of cases in many other countries, including the United States. The WHO stopped short of calling the outbreak a pandemic, but stressed that the status could change at any time.

Although COVID-19 appears to be highly transmissible, only a small percentage of people seems to develop severe illness, and an even smaller number die from the infection. However, statistics to date suggest worse prognosis with COVID-19 infection among people with diabetes and cardiovascular disease (CVD).

In a recent study published in JAMA, Zunyou Wu, MD, PhD, and Jennifer M. McGoogan, PhD, studied 44,672 confirmed COVID-19 cases that had been reported through February 11, 2020, and were analyzed by the Chinese Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Results from the study show that 80.9% of people in China who have been diagnosed with COVID-19 have had mild illness.

Of 72,314 patients from the Chinese Centers for Disease Control and Prevention case series, 44,672 (62%) were confirmed to be COVID-19 according to a positive viral nucleic acid test result on throat swab samples. Of these, 81% were classified as mild (ie, no pneumonia or mild pneumonia) and 14% as severe, having symptoms such as dyspnea, respiratory frequency of at least 30 breaths per minutes, blood oxygen saturation of 93% or lower, partial pressure of arterial oxygen to fraction of inspired oxygen ratio lower than 300, and/or lung infiltrates higher than 50% within 24 to 48 hours). Five percent of these cases were classified as critical, with symptoms such as respiratory failure, septic shock, and/or multiple organ dysfunction or failure.

There were 1023 deaths reported, for an overall CFR of 2.3%. A majority of those deaths occurred in patients classified as critical (49.0%), followed by 14.8% in those aged 80 years and older and 8.0% in those aged 70 to 79 years. There were no deaths reported in those aged 9 years or younger.

Death rate was elevated among those with preexisting comorbid conditions: 10.5% for CVD, 7.3% for diabetes, 6.3% for chronic respiratory disease, 6.0% for hypertension, and 5.6% for cancer.

What these results tell us is that is that a CFR in China of 2.3% is less than that for previous coronavirus outbreaks caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS; CFR, 9.6%) and Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS; CFR: 34.4%). Keep in mind that case fatality rates vary by factors such as age, sex, underlying medical conditions, and geography. Outside Hubei province in China, the epicenter of the outbreak, the CFR may be as low as 0.4% compared with 2.9% within the province.

That said, because COVID-19 has infected far more people than SARS or MERS, the newest coronavirus on the block has already claimed many more lives than its predecessors.

This then raises the question: Who is most at risk for severe illness and death from COVID-19?

Case Fatality Rate for Diabetes Is High, but Interpretation Is Tricky

Evidence suggests that diabetes may increase risk for infection from COVID-19 by 2- to 3-fold, independent of other medical problems such as CVD.

According to the JAMA study, COVID-19 has led to more total deaths because of the large number of cases compared with SARS and MERS. In a previous study by Chen et al, which looked at 99 confirmed patients with COVID-19 infections, 51% had chronic conditions, including CVD and cerebrovascular diseases (40%).[2] Average patient age in this study was 55.5 years, with two thirds of participants being men.

Before publication of the JAMA study, 2 relatively small case series of patients who had been hospitalized for COVID-19 in Wuhan also suggested that older men with underlying medical problems, especially CVD and diabetes, are more likely to develop severe illness from the virus.[3]

However, experts caution that for COVID-19 and similar infections, several factors may skew the data, making interpretation tricky. These findings suggest that increased mortality resulting from the COVID-19 infections is likely to occur in older people with comorbid conditions, similar to the influenza and other infectious diseases.

"Cases that are identified tend to be in patients that have more severe illness, compared to younger, healthier individuals who just stay home and don't seek medical care," said Preeti N. Malani, MD, an infectious disease specialist and chief health officer at the University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor. She further pointed out: "This is also the case with individuals who are sick enough to be hospitalized. There are more people with more chronic conditions, including diabetes [among hospitalized individuals].

"In general, diabetes can be a marker of other chronic health conditions like heart disease, as well as obesity, which might contribute to the increased risk of infection," Dr Malani added. "Diabetes is also much more common with age and will continue to be a marker of poor outcomes for [all of] these reasons," she said.

"The message we want to emphasize is that emergencies unmask vulnerabilities in diabetes. The old and the sick are the most vulnerable," Juliana C. N. Chan, MD, told Medscape Medical News in an interview.

Dr Chan is director of the Hong Kong Institute of Diabetes and Obesity at the Chinese University of Hong Kong.

Dr Chan and other experts are therefore calling for patients with diabetes, those with CVD, and patients with other chronic medical conditions to be extra vigilant in their efforts to avoid contact with the virus, although they also noted that individual responses will vary greatly. In past infectious disease outbreaks, including SARS and H1N1 influenza, people with diabetes were at increased risk for severe illness and death.

"I don't think it's an overstatement to say that people with diabetes...are at higher risk of developing COVID-19 because the data are suggestive," noted Dr Chan, although she cautioned that longer-term research will give a much clearer picture.

Poor Control of Diabetes a Risk Factor for Infection

Dr Chan was a senior coauthor on a study published last month in Diabetologia, as reported by Medscape Medical News, that found that mortality rates among people with diabetes in Hong Kong have plummeted in recent years, with the exception of young people, who may be more likely to have poorly controlled diabetes.[4]

Importantly, within the context of the COVID-19 outbreak, although deaths from most conditions such as CVD and cancer decreased among people with diabetes in that study, deaths from pneumonia among people with diabetes remained about the same.

In serious cases of infection, the COVID-19 virus invades the cells that line the respiratory tract and lungs and enters the mucus, causing pneumonia. Severe lung damage from pneumonia can result in acute respiratory distress syndrome, which in turn can cause septic shock.

Note that acute respiratory distress syndrome and septic shock are the main causes of death from COVID-19.

So far, according to WHO’s March 1st situation report, Hong Kong has had only 95 confirmed cases of COVID-19, although the first Hong Kong resident to die from the virus was a 39-year-old man with diabetes. That death was soon followed by a second death: a 70-year-old man with diabetes and other medical problems, including high blood pressure and kidney disease.

"Our message is to ask people with diabetes to do things early in order to protect themselves and reduce their risk of having problems if anything happens," Dr Chan emphasized to Medscape Medical News.

Although the mechanism of this increased susceptibility remains unclear, research suggests that high blood glucose levels may lead to reduced functioning of the immune system.

Each Person With Diabetes Is Different; Use Common Sense

All of this makes it tricky to tease out diabetes' individual contribution to infection risk.

"The proportion in which each medical condition contributes to [an individual's] risk of infection is hard to dissect out," explained Andrea Luk, MBChB, FHKCP, FHKAM.

Dr Luk is an associate professor at the Chinese University of Hong Kong and is the other senior coauthor of the study published in Diabetologia.[5]

"Certainly a person with both diabetes and [CVD] would have more risk than someone with diabetes and good glucose control and without any other comorbidities," she continued.

But because every person with diabetes is different, it is important to consider the whole package, she stressed.

Whether someone with diabetes succumbs to infection has a lot to do with glycemic control, diabetes duration, and diabetes-related comorbid conditions, such as heart disease, kidney disease, and stroke, as well as their age, their weight, and whether they smoke.

Dr Chan further clarified: "We have to judge this case by case. You cannot apply it across the board to all people with diabetes. A person with well-controlled diabetes is very different from someone with poorly controlled diabetes. They have a different set of risk factors and complications."

While awaiting a more detailed analysis, Dr Chan, Dr Luk, and Dr Malani all suggest common sense measures for patients with diabetes, CVD, and other chronic conditions: staying up to date with vaccinations, avoiding large crowds, frequent hand washing, avoiding touching eyes or mouth (the so-called T-zone), and wearing face masks in areas where COVID-19 is prevalent.

People with symptoms should also wear a facemask to avoid spreading infection to others.

"People with diabetes or other chronic conditions should be extra vigilant about protecting themselves from infection," Dr Luk reiterated. They should also have a lower threshold for seeking care if they feel they are developing symptoms of infection, she noted.

With all we know, it is safe to say that for non-critically ill patients, close follow-up is likely to be sufficient to manage the disease. However, aggressive treatments and intensive care are needed for critically ill patients with cofounding risk factors for CVD and diabetes.

Indications so far are that there is a worse prognosis for people with diabetes and other chronic medical conditions, such as CVD, if they become infected with COVID-19.

Statistics suggest that those who are the most vulnerable (ie, the elderly, people with comorbid conditions such as uncontrolled diabetes and CVD) can have a worse prognosis. More detailed analysis is needed, however, to show a clear connection between the two.

Dr Chan, Dr Luk, and Dr Malani have disclosed no relevant financial relationships.

JAMA. Published online February 24, 2020.

Study HighlightsA summary from the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention of 72,314 COVID-19 cases in mainland China as of February 11, 2020, included 44,672 confirmed cases (62%), 16,186 suspected cases (22%), 10,567 diagnosed cases (15%), and 889 asymptomatic cases (1%).Three quarters of cases were diagnosed in Hubei Province (75%), and 86% reported living in or having visited Wuhan or having close contact with a Wuhan resident or visitor.Age distribution among the 44,672 confirmed cases was from 30 to 79 years in 87%, 20 to 29 years in 8%, at least 80 years in 3%, 10 to 19 years in 1%, and younger than 10 years in 1%.Among 44,415 confirmed cases with available information regarding disease severity, 81% were mild (no or mild pneumonia), 14% were severe, and 5% were critical (respiratory failure, septic shock, and/or multiple organ dysfunction or failure).Severe cases were defined as those with dyspnea, respiratory frequency 30 or more breaths per minute, blood oxygen saturation of 93% or less, partial pressure of arterial oxygen to fraction of inspired oxygen ratio lower than 300, and/or lung infiltrates above 50% within 24 to 48 hours.Among 44,672 confirmed cases, CFR was 2.3% overall (1023 deaths), 49.0% in critical cases, 14.8% in patients aged at least 80 years, and 8.0% in patients aged 70 to 79 years.Older age and preexisting comorbid conditions were associated with higher CFR: 10.5% for CVD, 7.3% for diabetes, 6.3% for chronic respiratory disease, 6.0% for hypertension, and 5.6% for cancer.Experts interviewed by Medscape Medical News noted that diabetes is associated with double or triple the risk for infection from COVID-19, independent of CVD or other medical comorbidities.Infected healthcare personnel accounted for 3.8% of confirmed cases overall (5 deaths), 63% of cases in Wuhan, and 14.8% of severe or critical casesThe rapid spread of COVID-19 from the city of Wuhan to the entire country of China in just 30 days, reflecting both geographical expansion and sudden increase in case numbers, surprised and quickly overwhelmed Chinese health and public health services, especially in Wuhan City and Hubei Province.Epidemic curves suggest a mixed outbreak pattern, with early cases possibly reflecting zoonotic spillover at Huanan Seafood Wholesale Market or other continuous common sources, and later cases indicating a propagated source via person-to-person transmission.The JAMA article describes changes in the Chinese government epidemic response protocol after the SARS outbreak in 2002 to 2003: Although 300 SARS cases and 5 deaths had occurred before the Chinese government reported the outbreak to WHO, just 27 COVID-19 cases and no deaths had occurred before reporting to WHO.Given the lack of treatment and prevention options specific for COVID-19, such as targeted antiviral agents and vaccines, China's public health outbreak response strategies included isolation, quarantine, social distancing, and community containment (eg, by restricting travel, canceling gatherings, and prohibiting attendance at businesses and schools).The article concluded that preexisting comorbid conditions, particularly CVD and diabetes, and advanced age are associated with higher CFR.COVID-19 infection appears to be most severe among these most vulnerable groups, especially those with long-duration, poorly controlled diabetes, although further research is needed.Factors complicating interpretation of these associations include a higher case-identification rate in more severe cases and in hospitalized cases, higher prevalence of chronic conditions among hospitalized patients, and associations of diabetes with advancing age and with other chronic health conditions that also predispose to higher risk for infection.However, people with diabetes were at greater risk for severe illness and death in previous outbreaks of SARS, H1N1 influenza, and other infectious diseases, and hyperglycemia may contribute to impaired immune system functioning.Patients with diabetes, especially those with CVD or poor glycemic control, and those with other chronic medical conditions or risk factors should be particularly vigilant to avoid exposure to COVID-19 and other infections, and to have a lower threshold for medical attention if they develop symptoms of infection.Patients with diabetes should aim for optimal glucose control.Preventive strategies for patients with chronic comorbidities include following the recommended immunization schedule; avoiding large crowds; practicing good hand hygiene; avoiding touching the eyes, nose or mouth; and wearing face masks if exposure to COVID-19 is likely.Symptomatic individuals should also wear a face mask to avoid spreading infection to others.Everyone should follow travel advisories, which currently include avoiding nonessential travel to China.The JAMA article notes that a crucial objective is to buy enough time for scientific research before COVID-19 infection becomes too widespread.Although some containment measures implemented by the Chinese government might be viewed as extreme, the investigators concluded that the overall benefits and lives saved outweigh potential infringement of civil liberties.The article stresses the need for cooperation among countries in potential pandemics, as disease pathogens do not respect geopolitical borders.Specifically, WHO data (https://www.who.int/docs/default-source/coronaviruse/situation-reports/20200225-sitrep-36-covid-19.pdf) as of February 25 indicate 4 new countries (Afghanistan, Bahrain, Iraq, and Oman) reporting cases of COVID-19 in the last 24 hours, as well as 80,239 cases confirmed globally (908 new), 77,780 cases confirmed in China (518 new), and 2666 deaths in China (71 new).Outside China, there have been 2459 confirmed cases (390 new) in 33 countries (4 new), and 34 deaths (11 new).Although the vast majority of COVID-19 infections and deaths have been in China, there are now pockets of infection in Iran, Italy, Japan, and South Korea, as well as a few cases in many other countries.Despite the relatively low overall CFR in China of 2.3%, which is less than the previously reported CFR of SARS (9.6%) and MERS (34.4%), according to the JAMA article, the total number of deaths from COVID-19 far exceeds those from SARS or MERS because of potentially greater transmissibility and a higher number of cases.Detection and management of respiratory infections in the United States are complicated by the high prevalence and severity of seasonal influenza this year, which presents similarly to COVID-19.An infographic published in JAMA (https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2762386) on February 26 notes that as of February 15, in the United States, the 2019 to 2020 influenza season has led to at least 29 million ill patients, 13 million physician visits, 280,000 hospitalizations, and 16,000 deaths, including 105 pediatric deaths.
Clinical ImplicationsPreexisting comorbid conditions, particularly CVD and diabetes, and advanced age are associated with the higher CFR for COVID-19 infection, based on the largest case series to date of COVID-19.Patients with diabetes, especially those with CVD or poor glycemic control, and those with other chronic medical conditions or risk factors should be particularly vigilant to avoid exposure to COVID-19 and other infections, and to have a lower threshold for medical attention if they develop symptoms of infection.Implications for the Healthcare Team: Clinicians should continue to promote preventive strategies for patients with chronic comorbidities include following the recommended immunization schedule; avoiding large crowds; practicing good hand hygiene; avoiding touching the eyes, nose or mouth; and wearing face masks if exposure to COVID-19 is likely. Extra care and management should be taken in elderly patients and those with co-morbid conditions.



To: Cogito Ergo Sum who wrote (6016)3/21/2020 2:41:20 PM
From: russet  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 8282
 
The U.K. backed off on herd immunity. To beat COVID-19, we’ll ultimately need it.
Widespread immunity is essential for a successful vaccine, but establishing it could be difficult for the new coronavirus.

nationalgeographic.com

BY CATHLEEN O'GRADY

PUBLISHED MARCH 20, 2020

WHILE COUNTRIES AROUND the world began to lock down workplaces, schools, and public gatherings in response to the rapidly spreading coronavirus, the United Kingdom’s initial strategy sent many into an uproar.

At first, the U.K. chose not to shut down large gatherings or introduce stringent social distancing measures. In a plan that surprised many in the medical community, officials instead described a plan to suppress the virus through gradual restrictions, rather than trying to stamp it out entirely.

The strategy, an attempt to build “herd immunity,” involved allowing “enough of us who are going to get mild illness to become immune,” Sir Patrick Vallance, the U.K. government’s chief scientific adviser, told Sky News on March 13.

If the risks of COVID-19 were not so high, it would technically be possible to bring about herd immunity by allowing the disease to run rampant through a population. However, evidence shows that scenario would lead to high rates of hospitalization and need for critical care, straining health service capacity past the breaking point.


Projected effectiveness of COVID-19 mitigation strategies

300 critical

care beds per

100,000 people

in Great Britain

3-month intervention period

Do nothing

250

Closing schools

and universities alone

200

Case isolation alone

150

Case isolation and

household quarantine

100

Case isolation, etc.

and social distancing

of people over 70

50

Surge critical care

bed capacity

0

April

June

July

August

September

March

2020

May

October

KATIE ARMSTRONG, NG STAFF. SOURCE: IMPERIAL COLLEGE COVID-19 RESPONSE TEAM

After new simulations of the outbreak from Imperial College London showed how badly hospitals would be overwhelmed, the U.K. suddenly reversed course on Monday and introduced new social distancing measures. By Friday, the Prime Minister had ordered all pubs, restaurants, gyms, and cinemas to close.

Still, the question of herd immunity’s role in slowing the coronavirus lingers because of how it might determine the success of vaccine development—and the chances that the virus may flare back up once social distancing policies end.

Getting ahead of the virus
Viruses are stealthy. They disguise themselves as they infect a host and penetrate that host’s cells, which gives them a head start over the body’s immune response. Once a cell recognizes certain telltale signs of a pathogen, it throws out an alarm signal to the immune system. But because the virus has that head start, it still has time to replicate itself and infect a new host before the immune system can catch up.

TODAY’SPOPULAR STORIES

SCIENCE CORONAVIRUS COVERAGE

Why soap is preferable to bleach in the fight against coronavirus

HISTORY

Coronavirus is spreading panic. Here’s the science behind why.

SCIENCE

Here’s what coronavirus does to the body

Immune responses within a cell can take around 24 hours to trigger, says Elly Gaunt, a virologist at the University of Edinburgh’s Roslin Institute. A full-blown immune response can take another three days—which means that a respiratory virus like the flu, which can replicate in as little as eight hours, is way ahead of the game.

That’s why someone’s first experience with an infectious disease can be so nasty. The immune system is not so easily tricked a second time: When it’s beaten an invader once, it keeps a specialized weapons cache dedicated to that particular pathogen, ready to mount a high-speed reaction if it’s ever detected again. So, the second time the disease shows up in your body, the virus won’t have that handy head start.

People with immunity are “duds for transmission,” says Katie Gostic, a University of Chicago researcher who studies immunity to influenza. And when viral transmission can’t sustain itself an epidemic will slow down and end, she explains.

Herd immunity can only be reached when a precise proportion of a community becomes resistant to an infectious disease, says Yonatan Grad, an epidemiologist at the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health. You can’t have just some herd immunity, he explains, in the same way you can’t be just a little bit pregnant.

To have herd immunity, each infected person must, on average, infect less than one person (though clearly, it’s not possible to infect half a person; if some infected people pass on the infection and others don’t, the average transmission rate will be less than one.) Once the transmission rate drops below one, a community has herd immunity. That won’t stop each and every case, but it will prevent the disease from spreading indefinitely.

Many of our lessons on herd immunity come from the measles, because it's so contagious. The more infectious a disease is, the more people who need to be immune to reach herd immunity. One person with measles, for instance, could infect up to 18 other people in a susceptible population. To get that transmission rate all the way down to less than one, almost everyone in the population needs to act as a buffer between an infected person and a new potential host. That’s why measles needs such a high rate of herd immunity—around 95 percent.

Research so far suggests that the coronavirus has a lower infection rate than measles, with each infected person passing it on to two or three new people, on average. This means that herd immunity should be achieved when around 60 percent of the population becomes immune to COVID-19.

The do’s and don’ts of making a herd
Vaccines create a weapons cache for a disease without the body ever having to fight off the disease itself, which is why herd immunity is something that’s generally pursued through vaccination rather than infection. For example, about 30 percent of measles cases have complications such as seizures, pneumonia, and encephalitis, resulting in about two deaths for every thousand cases in the U.S. Exposing a whole population to measles would be a dangerous way to cultivate herd immunity among the survivors.

But it’s not unheard of for herd immunity to emerge through disease transmission. The infamous “chicken pox party” is a way some parents have intentionally exposed their children to a disease that’s commonly less harmful in childhood than in adulthood.

This means that herd immunity should be achieved when around 60 percent of the population becomes immune to COVID-19.

“The problem with coronavirus is that no-one has had it before, regardless of age,” says Gostic of the University of Chicago. It’s almost as if chicken pox had just emerged for the first time, leaving adults more susceptible to the more severe cases that come with age, she explains.

Herd immunity also isn’t something that can work for any disease. It doesn’t matter how many people are vaccinated against tetanus, for example: If someone who isn’t vaccinated steps on a rusty nail, they can still get infected, because tetanus lives in reservoirs outside of the human body. An infection must be transmitted between people for herd immunity to have a protective effect.

Immunity also doesn’t always last that long. HIV mutates so quickly that it can actually evolve within a single person, says Jessie Abbate, an infectious disease expert at the Research Institute for Development in France. Swiftly mutating flu is also a moving target for immunity and vaccines, which is why each flu season’s vaccine needs to anticipate the strain that will circulate widely, she explains.

What does this mean for coronavirus?
Four other coronaviruses already circulate among humans, says Gaunt, and they all cause the common cold, since we don’t stay immune to those viruses for very long. If the novel coronavirus is similar, that means that people would need to be repeatedly vaccinated or infected for herd immunity to be sustained.

Some reports describe reinfections of the novel coronavirus in people who tested positive again after they had already recovered. It’s not clear, though, that these are actually cases of reinfection—it’s more likely that they can be explained by people continuing to shed the virus for a long time, and that the level of virus shedding fluctuates over time.

Rapid reinfection is, for now, “an outside possibility,” Abbate agrees. If people were able to get sick again really quickly, we wouldn’t see the rapid decline in case numbers that is happening in certain parts of the world. And it would go against almost every other virus that we’ve known about, she says.