Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Let's Talk About Our Feelings!!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Grainne who wrote (17088)	1/26/1998 3:47:00 PM
From: Frank	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 108807

Christine, You'll excuse me (I hope) if I am not as literate or computer savy as yourself. However if I could run this computer box a little better, I would undoubtably be able to cut and paste for a day. If you go through your posts (IMHO)it seems to me,you insinuate proving him guilty is an acedemic excercise. Further you "appear" to attempt to represent "the female" point of view, as in a male vs female thing. Where I glean from the posts that the males are only trying to protect the presumtion of innocence (male or female) not the male ego. I respect females enough to treat them as equals, and not suppose them to be inferior or any less able. With no missrespect you seem to portray them all as "the damsel in distress". With no credit given to their ability to lie, steal, cheat, manipulate,and dishonor as well as any man if not better! With or without justification! You abuse the word "alleged". Do something for me if you could please, and share with us your suppositions and forward view of events, should all these "allegations" be eronious. Just in a way you suggest you like to analyize the crisis. I've no misrespect for you or anyone. I too am just sharing my perspective on the situations and comments that are posted. No more, no less, no better no worse. Respectfully Frank M