Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Wharf Rat who wrote (1212146)	3/23/2020 4:21:41 PM
From: Wharf Rat	4 Recommendations Recommended By chronicle pocotrader rdkflorida2 sylvester80 Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1576735

To: Wharf Rat who wrote (1212146)	3/23/2020 4:43:12 PM
From: Tenchusatsu	1 Recommendation Recommended By locogringo Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1576735

Wharfie, AFAIK, he's reporting the numbers we have. That's a far cry from what SeachRE said, "Trump wanted to 'KEEP THE NUMBERS DOWN'. That's what one calls negligence, to put it mildly.": Message 32623821 That's the statement you are defending. My post was in response to that. He just doesn't want to increase them with testing or with sick passengers. WTF are you talking about? He's racing to increase the testing. Meanwhile I already posted how some people, especially those in hard-hit areas, DON'T want increased testing: Message 32624638 That was reported by "Democracy Dies In Darkness," by the way. Now you tell me, should we increase the testing, or is that "largely an academic exercise" according to my friend? Tenchusatsu P.S. - As for "sick passengers," wow, who wants to increase the numbers by letting sick passengers go untested and unquarantined? You?